Fort Worth Elementary Teacher Accused of Assaulting Elderly Couple in Arlington Mall

Brenda Jones Stafford, a fifth-grade teacher at A.M. Pate Elementary School, is accused of choking and pushing a 71-year-old woman in an argument over a chair in The Parks mall’s food court, then shoving, hitting and choking the woman’s 73-year-old husband when he tried to intervene.

Barbara Griffith, a Fort Worth school district spokeswoman, confirmed Wednesday that the incident occurred while the teacher was accompanying A.M. Pate students on a field trip. She said Stafford was placed on administrative leave Monday pending the outcome of the investigation.

Bette Davis Morgan and her husband, Carlton, were drinking coffee and chatting in the food court when Stafford, while apparently gathering chairs for her group, pushed a chair on which Bette Morgan was resting her leg, commenting “Listen, lady, I don’t need your chair with your leg on it,” according to Morgan.

Morgan said she removed her leg from the chair and continued her conversation with her husband.

But she said Stafford deliberately shoved the chair against their table, striking Morgan’s knee. Morgan said she told the woman not to shove the chair because it was hitting her knee under the table.

She said Stafford deliberately did it again twice.

“Every time she came by, she’d shove that chair under the table toward my knee, hard,” said Morgan, who said she had injured the same knee in a wreck while in her teens.

After the third time, Morgan said, she got up and confronted Stafford.

“She made some kind of snotty remark to me, saying, ‘Don’t you tell me what to do, woman,’” Morgan said. “Then she got up in my face and started shaking her finger in my face and started blowing in my face.”

Morgan blew back into the woman’s face, she said, and the woman spat on her.

Morgan said that she spat to the side of Stafford and that the woman lunged at her, choked her and pushed her down.

Morgan said her husband was trying to intervene when Stafford shoved him down and began hitting and choking him.

“That’s when her people started yelling at her to get off of him, that she was acting like a madwoman, and pulled her off my husband,” Morgan said.

Tiara Richard, an Arlington police spokeswoman, said that officers arrested Stafford in another area of the mall and that neither of the Morgans required medical treatment.

Morgan said Wednesday that bruises have surfaced on her body and that she plans to see a doctor Friday to be checked out.

Tarrant County court records show that in 1995 Stafford was previously charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and assault with bodily injury, stemming from allegations that she threatened injury to a woman while using or exhibiting a firearm. Prosecutors later dismissed both charges.

David Duke Video Archive

Israel – The Real Rogue Nuclear State

Immigration and the Moral Right to Save Europe and the West!

Who Taught America to Torture?

The Little Bank that Saved Christmas!

Jewish Extremism and Its Media Cover Up

David Duke Wishes You a White Christmas!

The Zionist Matrix of Power HD

Christmas versus Hanukkah Peace and Love vs War and Hate HD

The War on Christmas! — How Jewish Extremists are Waging War on Western Culture

Wikileaks Exposes Zionist Treachery!
 
How Nations Die!

Bombs, Body scans, and Israel!

Freud, Zionism and Sexual Revolution

How Zionists Divide and Conquer!

Rape and Reality in America

Top Rabbi in Israel Exposes Jewish Racism!

Sex and Lies in Israel!

The Shocking Jewish Role in Slavery I – What Jewish Historians Say

The Shocking Jewish Role in Slavery II – The Media Cover Up

David Duke for President? –It’s up to YOU!

Race is Far More than Skin Color!

Oliver Stone Apologizes for Telling the Truth

Black Panthers, Obama & White Civil Rights!

Expose Senator Schumer and Israeli Terrorism!

Will the White Race Survive?

The Racial Supremacist State of Israel

Racism – Rand Paul & Rachel Maddow Part II

Zionist Racist Rachel Maddow and Rand Paul Part I

No War for Israel in Iran ! — Keep Americans Safe

White Genocide in South Africa

White Civil Rights?

Should Christians Support Israel?

Jewish Terrorism Against America!

The Dynamics of the Jewish Elite!

Affirmative Action is Racist !!

The Purim Celebration of Hate

Purim II: Promotion of Genocide

Hollywood Basterds by David Duke

Do Jews Control the Media? — The LA Times Says Yes!

Shoe Bombers, crotch bombers, 9/11 and Israel

The Zionist Matrix of Power in America

The Zionist Red Army by David Duke

Stop the Genocide of European Mankind

David Duke a Tribute to European Women

David Duke “Heart to Heart” Part 1

David Duke “Heart to Heart” Part 2

Hanukkah Hypocrisy by David Duke Part 1

Hanukkah Hypocrisy by David Duke Part 2

Holocaust Survivor Redefines AntiSemitism by David Duke

The War on Christmas!

War is Good – Obama Nobel Peace Prize Speech

US Army Uses Psy-Ops On US Elected Officials

I have a different take on this.  I can’t think of any Senators who need less convincing on war spending/protecting kikestan than John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Al Franken and Carl Levin. 

I think it’s certainly convenient for them now to have a victim card to throw out whenever it’s expedient for them.  For example, say McCain speaks to a pro war crowd, he can boast about how much money he has voted to throw at these wars, and if he speaks to an anti war crowd he can say “gee, as you know I was misled by certain key figures in our military as to the situation blah blah blah” and it’s an easy out for all of them.
________________________________________________________________________________________________

SOURCE

The U.S. Army illegally ordered a team of soldiers specializing in “psychological operations” to manipulate visiting American senators into providing more troops and funding for the war, Rolling Stone has learned – and when an officer tried to stop the operation, he was railroaded by military investigators.

The orders came from the command of Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, a three-star general in charge of training Afghan troops – the linchpin of U.S. strategy in the war. Over a four-month period last year, a military cell devoted to what is known as “information operations” at Camp Eggers in Kabul was repeatedly pressured to target visiting senators and other VIPs who met with Caldwell. When the unit resisted the order, arguing that it violated U.S. laws prohibiting the use of propaganda against American citizens, it was subjected to a campaign of retaliation.

“My job in psy-ops is to play with people’s heads, to get the enemy to behave the way we want them to behave,” says Lt. Colonel Michael Holmes, the leader of the IO unit, who received an official reprimand after bucking orders. “I’m prohibited from doing that to our own people. When you ask me to try to use these skills on senators and congressman, you’re crossing a line.”

The list of targeted visitors was long, according to interviews with members of the IO team and internal documents obtained by Rolling Stone. Those singled out in the campaign included senators John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Jack Reed, Al Franken and Carl Levin; Rep. Steve Israel of the House Appropriations Committee; Adm. Mike Mullen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; the Czech ambassador to Afghanistan; the German interior minister, and a host of influential think-tank analysts.

The incident offers an indication of just how desperate the U.S. command in Afghanistan is to spin American civilian leaders into supporting an increasingly unpopular war. According to the Defense Department’s own definition, psy-ops – the use of propaganda and psychological tactics to influence emotions and behaviors – are supposed to be used exclusively on “hostile foreign groups.” Federal law forbids the military from practicing psy-ops on Americans, and each defense authorization bill comes with a “propaganda rider” that also prohibits such manipulation. “Everyone in the psy-ops, intel, and IO community knows you’re not supposed to target Americans,” says a veteran member of another psy-ops team who has run operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. “It’s what you learn on day one.”

When Holmes and his four-man team arrived in Afghanistan in November 2009, their mission was to assess the effects of U.S. propaganda on the Taliban and the local Afghan population. But the following month, Holmes began receiving orders from Caldwell’s staff to direct his expertise on a new target: visiting Americans. At first, the orders were administered verbally. According to Holmes, who attended at least a dozen meetings with Caldwell to discuss the operation, the general wanted the IO unit to do the kind of seemingly innocuous work usually delegated to the two dozen members of his public affairs staff: compiling detailed profiles of the VIPs, including their voting records, their likes and dislikes, and their “hot-button issues.” In one email to Holmes, Caldwell’s staff also wanted to know how to shape the general’s presentations to the visiting dignitaries, and how best to “refine our messaging.”

Congressional delegations – known in military jargon as CODELs – are no strangers to spin. U.S. lawmakers routinely take trips to the frontlines in Iraq and Afghanistan, where they receive carefully orchestrated briefings and visit local markets before posing for souvenir photos in helmets and flak jackets. Informally, the trips are a way for generals to lobby congressmen and provide first-hand updates on the war. But what Caldwell was looking for was more than the usual background briefings on senators. According to Holmes, the general wanted the IO team to provide a “deeper analysis of pressure points we could use to leverage the delegation for more funds.” The general’s chief of staff also asked Holmes how Caldwell could secretly manipulate the U.S. lawmakers without their knowledge. “How do we get these guys to give us more people?” he demanded. “What do I have to plant inside their heads?”

According to experts on intelligence policy, asking a psy-ops team to direct its expertise against visiting dignitaries would be like the president asking the CIA to put together background dossiers on congressional opponents. Holmes was even expected to sit in on Caldwell’s meetings with the senators and take notes, without divulging his background. “Putting your propaganda people in a room with senators doesn’t look good,” says John Pike, a leading military analyst. “It doesn’t pass the smell test. Any decent propaganda operator would tell you that.”

At a minimum, the use of the IO team against U.S. senators was a misue of vital resources designed to combat the enemy; it cost American taxpayers roughly $6 million to deploy Holmes and his team in Afghanistan for a year. But Caldwell seemed more eager to advance his own career than to defeat the Taliban. “We called it Operation Fourth Star,” says Holmes. “Caldwell seemed far more focused on the Americans and the funding stream than he was on the Afghans. We were there to teach and train the Afghans. But for the first four months it was all about the U.S. Later he even started talking about targeting the NATO populations.” At one point, according to Holmes, Caldwell wanted to break up the IO team and give each general on his staff their own personal spokesperson with psy-ops training.

It wasn’t the first time that Caldwell had tried to tear down the wall that has historically separated public affairs and psy-ops – the distinction the military is supposed to maintain between “informing” and “influencing.” After a stint as the top U.S. spokesperson in Iraq, the general pushed aggressively to expand the military’s use of information operations. During his time as a commander at Ft. Leavenworth, Caldwell argued for exploiting new technologies like blogging and Wikipedia – a move that would widen the military’s ability to influence the public, both foreign and domestic. According to sources close to the general, he also tried to rewrite the official doctrine on information operations, though that effort ultimately failed. (In recent months, the Pentagon has quietly dropped the nefarious-sounding moniker “psy-ops” in favor of the more neutral “MISO” – short for Military Information Support Operations.)

Under duress, Holmes and his team provided Caldwell with background assessments on the visiting senators, and helped prep the general for his high-profile encounters. But according to members of his unit, Holmes did his best to resist the orders. Holmes believed that using his team to target American civilians violated the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which was passed by Congress to prevent the State Department from using Soviet-style propaganda techniques on U.S. citizens. But when Holmes brought his concerns to Col. Gregory Breazile, the spokesperson for the Afghan training mission run by Caldwell, the discussion ended in a screaming match. “It’s not illegal if I say it isn’t!” Holmes recalls Breazile shouting.

In March 2010, Breazile issued a written order that “directly tasked” Holmes to conduct an IO campaign against “all DV visits” – short for “distinguished visitor.” The team was also instructed to “prepare the context and develop the prep package for each visit.” In case the order wasn’t clear enough, Breazile added that the new instructions were to “take priority over all other duties.” Instead of fighting the Taliban, Holmes and his team were now responsible for using their training to win the hearts and minds of John McCain and Al Franken.

On March 23rd, Holmes emailed the JAG lawyer who handled information operations, saying that the order made him “nervous.” The lawyer, Capt. John Scott, agreed with Holmes. “The short answer is that IO doesn’t do that,” Scott replied in an email. “[Public affairs] works on the hearts and minds of our own citizens and IO works on the hearts and minds of the citizens of other nations. While the twain do occasionally intersect, such intersections, like violent contact during a soccer game, should be unintentional.”

In another email, Scott advised Holmes to seek his own defense counsel. “Using IO to influence our own folks is a bad idea,” the lawyer wrote, “and contrary to IO policy.”

In a statement to Rolling Stone, a spokesman for Caldwell “categorically denies the assertion that the command used an Information Operations Cell to influence Distinguished Visitors.” But after Scott offered his legal opinion, the order was rewritten to stipulate that the IO unit should only use publicly available records to create profiles of U.S. visitors. Based on the narrower definition of the order, Holmes and his team believed the incident was behind them.

Three weeks after the exchange, however, Holmes learned that he was the subject of an investigation, called an AR 15-6. The investigation had been ordered by Col. Joe Buche, Caldwell’s chief of staff. The 22-page report, obtained by Rolling Stone, reads like something put together by Kenneth Starr. The investigator accuses Holmes of going off base in civilian clothes without permission, improperly using his position to start a private business, consuming alcohol, using Facebook too much, and having an “inappropriate” relationship with one of his subordinates, Maj. Laural Levine. The investigator also noted a joking comment that Holmes made on his Facebook wall, in response to a jibe about Afghan men wanting to hold his hand. “Hey! I’ve been here almost five months now!” Holmes wrote. “Gimmee a break a man has needs you know.”

“LTC Holmes’ comments about his sexual needs,” the report concluded, “are even more distasteful in light of his status as a married man.”

Both Holmes and Levine maintain that there was nothing inappropriate about their relationship, and said they were waiting until after they left Afghanistan to start their own business. They and other members of the team also say that they had been given permission to go off post in civilian clothes. As for Facebook, Caldwell’s command had aggressively encouraged its officers to the use the site as part of a social-networking initiative – and Holmes ranked only 15th among the biggest users.

Nor was Holmes the only one who wrote silly things online. Col. Breazile’s Facebook page, for example, is spotted with similar kinds of nonsense, including multiple references to drinking alcohol, and a photo of a warning inside a Port-o-John mocking Afghans – “In case any of you forgot that you are supposed to sit on the toilet and not stand on it and squat. It’s a safety issue. We don’t want you to fall in or miss your target.” Breazile now serves at the Joint Chiefs of Staff, where he works in the office dedicated to waging a global information war for the Pentagon.

Following the investigation, both Holmes and Levine were formally reprimanded. Holmes, believing that he was being targeted for questioning the legality of waging an IO campaign against U.S. visitors, complained to the Defense Department’s inspector general. Three months later, he was informed that he was not entitled to protection as a whistleblower, because the JAG lawyer he consulted was not “designated to receive such communications.”

Levine, who has a spotless record and 19 service awards after 16 years in the military, including a tour of duty in Kuwait and Iraq, fears that she has become “the collateral damage” in the military’s effort to retaliate against Holmes. “It will probably end my career,” she says. “My father was an officer, and I believed officers would never act like this. I was devastated. I’ve lost my faith in the military, and I couldn’t in good conscience recommend anyone joining right now.”

After being reprimanded, Holmes and his team were essentially ignored for the rest of their tours in Afghanistan. But on June 15th, the entire Afghan training mission received a surprising memo from Col. Buche, Caldwell’s chief of staff. “Effective immediately,” the memo read, “the engagement in information operations by personnel assigned to the NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan and Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan is strictly prohibited.” From now on, the memo added, the “information operation cell” would be referred to as the “Information Engagement cell.” The IE’s mission? “This cell will engage in activities for the sole purpose of informing and educating U.S., Afghan and international audiences….” The memo declared, in short, that those who had trained in psy-ops and other forms of propaganda would now officially be working as public relations experts – targeting a worldwide audience.

As for the operation targeting U.S. senators, there is no way to tell what, if any, influence it had on American policy. What is clear is that in January 2011, Caldwell’s command asked the Obama administration for another $2 billion to train an additional 70,000 Afghan troops – an initiative that will already cost U.S. taxpayers more than $11 billion this year. Among the biggest boosters in Washington to give Caldwell the additional money? Sen. Carl Levin, one of the senators whom Holmes had been ordered to target.

Hundreds Of Medical Professionals Arrested For Stealing Millions From Medicaid

(NaturalNews) Representing the largest medical fraud case in history, federal authorities have arrested more than 100 doctors, nurses, physical therapists, and other medical professionals for allegedly swindling hundreds of millions of dollars from the federal Medicare program. The violators, who were busted in nine different U.S. cities, are said to have fraudulently billed Medicare for sometimes millions of dollars for simple procedures, and even for procedures they never even performed.

In Brooklyn, N.Y., for instance, federal agents targeted three physical therapy clinics for scamming at least $50 million from Medicare over the past two years. The clinics were paying phony patients to go along with being falsely diagnosed for conditions they did not have, and come to fake appointments via costly ambulance services.

In Detroit, Mich., a podiatrist was apprehended for billing Medicare roughly $700,000 for a procedure that was the equivalent of a toenail clipping. Another incident in Brooklyn, N.Y., involved a proctologist who billed Medicare $6.5 million for hemorrhoid removals, most of which he allegedly never even performed. And in Miami, Fla., two doctors and a handful of nurses were indicted for bilking $25 million from Medicare for phony prescriptions.

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Medicare fraud cost U.S. taxpayers more than $24 billion in 2009 alone. Daniel Levinson, HHS inspector General, told the U.S. Congress recently that more than 1,300 investigations in the past year alone have led to 500 Medicare fraud convictions that totaled more than $3 billion.

“Health care fraud schemes commonly include billing for services that were not provided or were not medically necessary, purposely billing for a higher level of service than what was provided, misreporting costs or other data to increase payments, paying kickbacks, and/or stealing providers’ or beneficiaries’ identities,” Levinson said to Congress.

The Unions Vs We The People

Great article from C4L

SOURCE

For the past week, much attention has turned to Madison, WI, where Governor Scott Walker is taking on the public sector unions in an all-out battle royale.  The scene has been one of massive protests by the unions, and over a dozen State Senate Democrats actually fled the state to keep the legislature from having a quorum, which is necessary for them to hold a vote.
The Washington Examiner‘s Tim Carney has an excellent piece showing how “there’s no fat-cat owner wanting to pocket more profits here. The unions’ target in Wisconsin is the taxpayer.”

The ferment in Wisconsin is no workers’ uprising against the rich and powerful. It is instead political muscle-flexing by a well-funded special interest group, which is limbering up for President Obama’s re-election bid. Obama’s campaign, operating as Organizing for America, is bussing protesters to the state capitol and manning phone banks to apply pressure to state legislatures. Obama himself has called Gov. Scott Walker’s bill curbing government-sector collective bargaining “an attack on unions.”

I would encourage folks to read the rest and see how he makes his point.  But before you go feeling sorry for the public-sector workers, The Daily Caller ran an article today showing some of these teachers are making a “bit” more than they let on publicly…
For instance:

Wisconsin’s 2010 Teacher of the Year, Leah Lechleiter-Luke of Mauston High School, told CNN the budget changes would force her to look for additional part-time work.
“When people say that public sector employees live high off the hog, I’d like to share that for 13 of my 19-year teaching career I have held a part-time job either in the summer or teaching night class at the local technical college,” Lechleiter-Luke told CNN. “In addition to tightening the belt even more and crossing our fingers that nothing breaks, I will need to find part-time work again.”
Lechleiter-Luke makes $54,928 in base salary and $32,213 in “fringe benefits,” which include health insurance, life insurance and retirement pay.

Compare that to the average WI workers pay of $37,398 in 2009, according to the Department of Commerce.
In addition to the salary and benefits, teachers in WI, like most states, are only contracted to work part of the year.

Most teachers start their work year around Aug. 30 and end around June 3, according to the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. They also get vacation time during the student breaks, like during Christmas, fall vacation and spring vacation. Year-round, teachers in the state are out of the classroom for about 13 or 14 weeks.

There’s a major problem with public-sector unions, one that Tim Carney notes the WSJ points out:

As the Wall Street Journal pointed out, campaign contributions by government-sector unions, collected through mandatory dues, help elect the public officials who are then supposed to negotiate with them: “The unions sit, in effect, on both sides of the bargaining table.” [emphasis added]

Finally, remember the Tea Party and other like-minded groups being called extremists for making Hitler/Nazi comparisons?  Hmm, I do… Anyways, Heritage Foundation sent a film crew to separate out the myths and facts of what is being said in WI.  Here’s what they found.