Surprise, Zimbabwe’s Elections Weren’t Fair

The so called “Khampepe Report” has been released which concludes the following regarding Mugabe’s election in 2002.  Communist leaders have fought the release of this report to the public because it details their crimes.

 

  • The elections in Zimbabwe, more than anything else, have been characterised by a high level of polarisation between the Zanu-PF and MDC, and between members of their respective parties.
  • Intimidation and violence in certain areas of Zimbabwe were the hallmark of the pre-election period. At least 107 people, whose names, places of residence and dates of death have been published, were reported killed in attacks related to political violence between March 2000 and election month March 2002. Although police were extremely reluctant to provide statistics, the majority of these victims are said to be members or supporters of the MDC.
  • It is common cause that the Zanu-PF has established a military trained youth group, known as youth militia. Reports by the SA and other observer missions show that these youth militia have been the primary perpetrators of violence and intimidation against members and supporters of the MDC or sections of the population that appear not to support Zanu-PF.
  • In varying degrees, this election-related violence and threats of violence, arson and hostage-taking have curtailed freedom of movement, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly and of association of voters.
  • In the lead-up to the presidential elections, the electoral laws of Zimbabwe were amended dramatically and manipulated by executive decrees.
  • Final voter rolls and information on polling stations were not available timeously.
  • There was no equal or equitable access to publicly owned and funded media.
  • The executive government discarded the rule of law by failing to give effect to decisions of the high court and the Supreme Court, and introducing statutory instruments or regulations that altered, reversed or undermined court decisions.
  • Police treatment of supporters of each of the two main candidates appears to have been partial.
  • The number of polling stations in urban constituencies, and particularly in Harare and Chitungwiza, were substantially reduced. This reduction severely curtailed voters’ access to polling stations. On the third day of polling, many voters who wished to cast their vote did not have a reasonable opportunity to do so. The number of voters prevented from voting could not be ascertained.
  • It should, however, be recorded that in all the other constituencies, polling stations were easily accessible to the electorate. The secrecy of the ballot was observed. Requirements such as effective design of ballot papers, ballot boxes, impartial assistance to voters, transporting of election materials where necessary and protection of polling stations were accomplished.

 

You can read more about this story here

 

 

List Of Jews In Soviet Russia

SOURCE

This reads like a guest list to a bar mitzvah.

The Bolsheviks Of Russia

Revised 1-26-05

Most of the top Bolshevik officials in communist Russia from 1917-onward were Jewish by race/ethnicity. The few non-Jewish officials in the list below are specifically noted as being not Jewish. [Note on name spellings: Russian names are spelled differently depending upon the source, e.g., Yoffe is also spelled Ioffe and sometimes Joffe; Grigory is sometimes Grigori or even Grigorii].

It should be noted that most of the Bolshevik leaders who were not Jewish nonetheless had Jewish wives, e.g. Bukharin, Rykov, Molotov, Voroshilov, Kirov, Dzherzhinsky, Lunacharsky. As such, the Jewish taproot that ran through Soviet government from 1917-onward is larger than many people realize. Also, the term ‘Bolshevik’ is used rather loosely here.

1. Vladimir I. Lenin [1870-1924]: first Premier of the USSR; Marxist theoretician; a lawyer; founder of the Bolsheviks [1903]; supreme dictator of early Bolshevik regime; founder of the Comintern; author of the Marxist handbook “State and Revolution”; Lenin was one-quarter Jewish, and is rumored to have been married to a crypto-Jew, however, evidence of that seems lacking.

2. Joseph Stalin [1879-1953]: an early Bolshevik; supreme dictator of Soviet Union from 1927-1953. After V. Lenin’s death, and prior to 1927, the Bolshevik regime was run by a triumvirate composed of Zinoviev, Kamenev, and Stalin. Stalin was the editor of the Bolshevik newspaper, Pravda [“Truth”]. Stalin was married to a Jewess, i.e. his third marriage, which apparently wasn’t officially formalized. Stalin was not a vigorous supporter of forcing Communism upon other countries — unlike Trotsky — a feature which likely prevented a Soviet assault upon various Western countries. [Not Jewish].

3. Leon Trotsky [t/n Bronstein] [1879-1940]: Trotsky was a Menshevik; was Commissar of Foreign Affairs; supreme commander of the Soviet Red Army; member of Politburo; he rebelled against Stalin and his supporters and was murdered by Stalin for that reason. Trotsky strongly advocated the idea of global — not simply local — Marxist revolution.

4. Lazar M. Kaganovich [1893-1991]: a prime director of mass-murder for Stalin; held a series of vocations, including commissar of transport, heavy industry and the fuel industry; a Politburo member; he was Stalin’s brother-in-law and also his chief advisor; many execution orders bore Kaganovich’s signature [1], evidence that he had the power to order the deaths of civilians [2]. During the 1930s, he was in charge of the deportations of “enemies of the state” to Siberia; was nicknamed the “Wolf of the Kremlin” because of his penchant for violence. He was considered by many to be the most powerful and important man under Stalin. Died of old age in Moscow.

5. Grigory Zinoviev [aka Apfelbaum; aka Radomyslsky] [1883-1936]: great pal of Lenin; member of the Central Committee; chairman of the Comintern; member of Politburo; executive of secret police; first president of the Third International; A. Lunacharsky called him “one of the principal counsellors of our Central Committee and [he] belongs unquestionably to the four or five men who constitute the political brain of the Party.”

6. Grigori Y. Sokolnikov [1888-1939]:a Bolshevik; friend of Trotsky; Commissar of Finance; a diplomat; member of the “Left Opposition”; Soviet ambassador to England; creator of the “chervonetz,” the first stable Soviet currency; was part of “Russian” delegation that signed the Brest-Litovsk treaty in 1918; member of the Central Committee and Politburo.

7. Moisei Uritsky [1873-1918]: Uritsky was a Menshevik; chief of the Petrograd Cheka, in which capacity he ordered many people who opposed Communism to be executed as “counter-revolutionaries”; Commissar for Internal Affairs in the Northern Region; the commissar of the Constituent Assembly; member of the Central Committee; a member of the “Revolutionary Military Center.”

8. Felix Dzherzhinsky [1877-1926]: a Pole; a high-strung fanatic; founder/director of the Cheka [All-Russian Extraordinary Commission for Combating Counter-Revolution and Sabotage], which was later renamed the State Political Directorate [GPU], which later became the OGPU and then the NKVD [Peoples Commissariat for Internal Affairs]; member, Central Committee; Commissar of Transport. [Not Jewish but philosemitic and married to a Jew].

9. Maxim Litvinov [aka Wallakh] [1876-1951]: Soviet foreign minister/diplomat/ambassador; in 1933, he persuaded the United States to recognize the Communist Soviet government as “legit” — thanks, in part, to America’s president F. D. Roosevelt being part-Jewish; first chairman, State Committee on the Anthem [official musical anthems].

10. Lavrenti Beria [1899-1953]: member of the Cheka; later became head of the Peoples Commissariat for Internal Affairs [NKVD] in Georgia, then later the NKVD proper. Beria had large numbers of prisoners executed [3]; was involved in the Atomic Bomb project in the USSR; [Beria was roughly 1/4 Jewish from his mother’s ancestry].

11. Yakov [Jacob] Sverdlov [aka Solomon] [1885-1919]: member, “Revolutionary Military Center”; member, Central Committee; close buddy of Lenin; aided Lenin with Lenin’s political theories; Sverdlov ordered the massacre of the Czar’s family in 1918. Sverdlov succeeded Kamenev and became the second Jewish president of the so-called “Soviet Republic.”

12. Sergei M. Kirov [1886-1934]; early Bolshevik; member of the Politburo; Secretary of the Central Committee; Communist Party boss in Leningrad. Stalin used Kirov’s murder in 1934 to justify the party purges and treason trials of the late 1930s. [Apparently not Jewish but married to a Jew].

13. Nikolai V. Krylenko [1885-1938]: an early Bolshevik; member of editorial board of Pravda; member of the executive committee of the Petrograd Soviet; famous chess player; member of the Communist Party Central Committee; a military commissar; as President of the Supreme Tribunal he prosecuted most political trials in the 1920s; in 1931, Stalin appointed Krylenko Commissar of Justice; he was involved in the convictions of many Communist Party members during the Great Purges. [Not Jewish].

14. Karl Radek [aka Sobelsohn] [1885-1939]; early revolutionary; old confidante of Lenin; member of the Central Committee; an “international” Communist activist; a key player in the creation of the Comintern; a writer for the Soviet government newspaper Izvestia; participated in the Brest-Litovsk peace negotiations with Germany; he also was active in Germany, working with Jewish-German Communist Rosa Luxemburg.

15. Viacheslav I. Molotov [1890-1986]: early Bolshevik; helped found Pravda newspaper; head of the Ukrainian Communist Party; member of the Politburo; Commissar for Foreign Affairs; headed a Politburo commission to “eliminate the kulaks as a class.” [Apparently not Jewish but philosemitic; his wife was Jewish, named Zhemchuzina].

16. Vladimir Antonov-Ovseenko [1884-1939]: a former Menshevik; Chief of Political Administration of the Red Army; an unofficial ambassador to Czechoslovakia and Poland; Commissar for Military Affairs in Petrograd; Commissar of War; led the Red Army invasion of the Ukraine; led the attack on the Winter Palace; editor of the Menshevik “Nashe Slovo” newspaper.

17. Yakov [Jacob] Yurovsky [y/b/d unknown]: head of Ekaterinburg Cheka; “Commissar of Justice” for Ural Regional Soviet; the leader of the Bolshevik squad that carried out the murders of Czar Nicholas II and his family in 1918. The murder of mild-mannered Nicholas was carried out almost completely by Jews, including Goloshchekin, Syromolotov, Safarov, Voikov, in addition to Yurovsky.

18. Grigory Sergo Ordzhonikidze [1886-1937]; member of the Politburo; Commissar for Heavy Industry; helped solidify Bolshevik power in Armenia and Georgia; Chairman of the Caucasus Central Committee of the Communist Party; First Secretary of the Transcaucasian Communist Party Committee; Chairman of the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party; became Stalin’s top economic official. [Apparently not Jewish].

19. Genrikh [Henry] Yagoda [1891-1938]; a Polish Jew; former Cheka member; an officer in SMERSH, the Ninth Division of the OGPU, its liquidation arm; People’s Commissar of Internal Affairs; chief of the NKVD; also in charge of gulag forced-labor camps. Developing fast-acting poisons was a Yagoda hobby; he created a laboratory for that purpose.

20. Lev Kamenev [aka Rosenfeld] [1883-1936]; member of the Central Committee; Chairman of the Moscow Soviet; member of Politburo; author of Marxist handbook “The Dictatorship of the Proletariat,” 1920; was elected first President of new Bolshevik government, aka “Soviet Republic” [Lenin was Premier]; was married to Trotsky’s sister.

21. Anatoly V. Lunacharsky [1875-1933]; an early Marxist; Commissar for Education and Enlightenment; League of Nations ambassador; key player in persuading Russian workers to support the Bolshevik Revolution; was an author – wrote the “Revolutionary Silhouettes” of top Bolshevik pals; [Apparently not Jewish but married to a Jew].

22. Fedor [Theodore] Dan [1871-1947]: was a Menshevik; was a member of the editorial board of the Menshevik journal “Iskra”; was author of the book “The Origins of Bolshevism” [1943], where he claimed that Bolshevism had been chosen by history to be “the carrier of socialism”; but he was actually an opponent of most Bolshevik ideas; he was sent into exile in 1921 after being arrested; he was married to Menshevik leader Julius Martov’s sister.

23. Nikolai Bukharin [1888-1938]: Lenin’s chief Marxist theorist; general secretary/chairman of the Comintern; member of the Politburo; member, Central Committee; he was editor of Pravda and also Izvestia, a political newspaper; led, with Rykov, the “Right Opposition” to defend the NEP [New Economic Policy]; [Apparently not Jewish yet married to a Jew].

24. Nikolai Yezhov [1895-1939]: early Bolshevik; served in various capacities in the Cheka, GPU, and OGPU; was military commissar in various Red Army units; was G. Yagoda’s deputy; People’s Commissar of Internal Affairs; head of NKVD; was deputy People’s Commissar of Agriculture for the USSR.

25. Mikhail I. Kalinin [1875-1946]; early Bolshevik; cofounder of the newspaper Pravda; nominal, “puppet” president of Soviet Union until 1946; replaced Sverdlov as Chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of the Communist Party; Chairman of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR.

26. Isaac Steinberg [y/b/d unknown]; Commissar of Justice. Later brought Jewish-flavored radicalism to Australia.

27. Alexei Rykov [1881-1938]; Premier of Soviet Union until 1930; member of Lenin’s Politburo; Commissar of the Interior; Chairman of the Supreme Council of National Economy; Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars; led the “Right Opposition” with Bukharin to defend the NEP [New Economic Policy]. [not Jewish, but married to a Jew].

28. Matvei D. Berman [y/b/d unknown]: chief of gulag system and Deputy Commissar of the NKVD; brother of Boris.

29. Naftaly Frenkel [y/b/d unknown]: a director of the gulag prison camp system; Turkish-born; was works chief/chief overseer of the one-hundred-and-forty-mile-long Belomor [White Sea-Baltic] canal project in Russia, a canal linking the White Sea and the Baltic, built from 1931–34; it was created entirely with slave labor; 60,000 workers died building the canal, the project having a mortality rate of roughly 10%.

30. Adolph Yoffe [aka Ioffe] [1883-1927]: Commissar of Foreign Affairs; ex-Menshevik; close friend of Trotsky’s; helped publish the Pravda newspaper; delegate at the Brest-Litovsk peace negotiations; member of the State General Planning Commission; was later Soviet ambassador to China, Japan and Austria.

31. Lev Inzhir [y/b/d/ unknown]: chief accountant for the gulag prison system.

32. Boris Berman [ -1938]: served as the Byelorussian NKVD’s Commissar until 1938; brother of Matvei.

33. K. V. Pauker [y/b/d unknown]: head of the Operations Department of the NKVD.

34. Aleksandr Orlov [aka L. Feldbin] [1898-1970]: member of the Cheka; advisor to Spanish Communists in Spain; commander, Soviet Red Army; later worked at the Law School of the University of Michigan in America [!].

35. Ilya Ehrenburg [1891-1967]: Soviet propaganda minister during WWII; delegate for Moscow in the Supreme Soviet; Communist writer; organizing member of JAC [Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee]; worked for Izvestia newspaper; performed research regarding Spain for the NKVD; author of book “The Ninth Wave,” and winner of two Stalin Prizes.

36. Yemelyan Yaroslavsky [t/n M. I. Gubelman]; [birth/death dates unknown]; head of the Central Control Commission; apparently was in charge of stopping the Christian religion in Russia.

37. Pavel [aka Paul] Axelrod [1850-1928]; co-founded Russia’s first socialist party with Georgii Plekhanov.

38. A. B. Khalatov [ ]; Commissar of publishing, head of food allocations in the Soviet Union.

39. Yona Yakir [ -1937]; Soviet military general; a commander in Kiev; purged by Stalin.

40. A. A. Slutsky [ ]; boss of Boris Berman [see above].

41. Semyon [aka S.G.] Firin [ ]; a commander at the White Sea-Baltic canal project.

42. Jacob [aka Yakov] Rappoport [ ]; a Latvian Jew; deputy commander at the White Sea-Baltic canal project.

43. V. Volodarsky [t/n M. M. Goldstein] [1891-1918] ; a Bolshevik; press commissar in Petrograd; Ukranian; lived in America for some time; assassinated.

44. G. D. Sachs [1882- ]; a Bolshevik; a member of the Military Revolutionary Committee which directed the Bolshevik takeover of Russia.

45. Dziga Vertov [t/n Denis or Dennis Kaufman] [1896- ]; involved in Soviet propaganda programs involving film/movies.

46. Mikhail Koltsov [ ]; a top Communist journalist in Russia.

47. Jaan Anvelt [1884 – 1937]; head of the Estonia government controlled by Moscow.

48. Martyn Latsis [ ]; top Cheka official; author of an early book about the Cheka.

49. I. A. Teodorovich [ ]; Commissar of Provisions.

50. Simon [aka Simeon] Dimanstein [ ]; Commissar of Nationalities; author.

51. Jacob Fuerstenberg [aka “Ganetzsky”] [t/n Jakub Hanecki] [1879-1937]; Polish; a top aide to Lenin and a key player in Lenin’s rise to power.

52. Alexander Israel Helphand [aka “Parvus”] [1867-1924]; helped Trotsky develop the theory of “permanent revolution.”

53. David Riazanov [aka Goldenbach] [1870-1938]; responsible for Soviet government publication of Karl Marx’s literary works.

54. Mikhail Milshtein [ ] a military officer; deputy director of Soviet military intelligence during WWII.

55. Gregory Gershuni [1870-1908]; an early revolutionary in Russia; was involved in the assassinations of Russian political leaders.

56. Polina S. Zhemchuzhina [1884 -1970]; wife of Molotov; Deputy Commissar of the Food Industry; Commissar of the Fish Industry.

57. Nikolai N. Sukhanov [aka Nikolai Gimmer] [1882-1940]; an economist; a member of the Contact Committee; an author.

58. I. P. Meshkovsky [aka I. P. Goldenberg] [ ]; a member of the Central Committee.

59. David A. Dragunsky [1910-1992]; a Colonel-General in the Soviet army.

60. Ivan D. Chernyakhovsky [1906-1945]; Soviet military general.

[1] Kaganovich’s signature as appearing on execution orders/lists: the book “The Black Book of Communism,” Harvard University Press, USA, 1999, page 189, hardcover.

[2] about Kaganovich’s crimes: Here

[3] Beria instigating the mass executions of the Katyn massacre: book “The Black Book of Communism,” page 368-369, hardcover.

Sources for the above document include, but are not limited to: the book “Red October,” by Robert V. Daniels, Scribners, 1967; the book “The Harvest of Sorrow,” by Robert Conquest, Oxford University Press, 1986; the book “The Black Book of Communism,” by Stephane Courtois et al, Harvard University Press, 1999; plus web searches and public library research.

Pied Pipers Of The Truth Movement: Where Exactly Are They Trying To Lead Us?

There is no other intro I can give other than to say this is one of the best, if not the best articles I have read all year. It touches on all bases (which is rare) and contains information which everyone needs to understand and contemplate. It is interesting and well written and I can’t recommend it highly enough. I am very grateful to kf who sent this to me [email protected] mega hat tip to him.

It is quite long, but very well worth it, it covers a lot of ground.  I have posted it in full here, but for better viewing (embedded videos, pictures and links) you may want to head to the original site, link below.

SOURCE

Several of the previous articles on this blog have looked at the possibility that at least some of the high profile, celebrity, anti-New World Order researchers or campaigners are not quite what they seem. Others have also written on this subject as more people come to suspect that many of these ‘truthers’ are either shills or controlled opposition or at the very least deceived themselves into furthering the broader ‘New World Order’ agenda. Although it can’t hope to be a definitive summary of what it is happening in this regard, this article will try to look at just a few of the conclusions that can be reached from this realisation.

The first and perhaps most obvious conclusion we can reach is that a degree of disinformation is being purposefully disseminated. It’s not hard to see why this should be occurring. As the real agenda is being pursued it serves to confuse and divide those alert enough to know that something very wrong is taking place. Confusion is created by offering differing points of view as to what is happening. In the process any real truth tends to get lost in the haze of disinformation. That’s not to say a deeper understanding can’t be achieved but just that it’s a much harder task.

Many people baulk at the idea of taking the, so called, ‘Protocols of the Elders of Zion’ seriously. Primarily this is because they are deemed to be ‘anti-Semitic’ and one of the justifications of the persecution of the Jewish people by Hitler. There are many suggestions as to who the authors of the ‘Protocols’ were. The Rothschilds, of course, leading freemasons including Albert Pike and even the Jesuits. In short, the authorship of the document is shrouded in mystery and even if it were proved beyond doubt that it was elite ‘Jewish’ Zionists that wrote it, that wouldn’t mean that all Jewish people were responsible or give cause to persecute them in any way. For example in Protocol 9 we read:

“Anti Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren…”

This alone proves that even if it was ‘elite’ Jews it certainly isn’t for the benefit of the majority. My own feelings are that they are unlikely to be a solely Jewish production for solely Jewish aims. The occult ‘elite’ behind the drive for spiritual and temporal control of the world and humanity operate through many fronts. They also use many of these fronts as a form of cover. Suggesting the Protocols are Jewish then slandering anyone who points out that they accurately reflect events in the world as ‘anti-Semitic’ is, perhaps, an example of that cover. The occult ‘elite’ comprises of both Jew and Gentile and the ordinary Jewish person is every bit as deceived and manipulated as anyone else in the ‘West’, even if, perhaps, in different ways. Anyone bothering to read the ‘Protocols’ for themselves soon sees a remarkable similarity between the words in them and what is happening at the present time.

The reason I mention this is because I want to use several quotes from the ‘Protocols’. For example, from Protocol 5 we read:

“In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by broadcasting so many contradictory opinions from all sides and for such a long time that it will make the Goyim lose their heads in a maze of confusion. They will come to realise that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in political matters, especially when it is intended that the public should not understand the issues being discussed. In that way the Goyim will leave the opinions and understanding of the issues to those who guide the public. This is the first secret.”

As noted in the ‘Mass Immigration and the New Tower of Babel’ article, William Carr, the author of the unfinished, manuscript, written in 1959, called ‘Satan: Prince of This World’, discusses the meaning of the word ‘goyim’. Many believe it to mean gentiles or non-Jews. Carr suggested that its original meaning was ‘the masses or common people’ but then later became ‘lesser beings’ or ‘the mob’. He then notes that revered American freemason of the 33rd degree, Albert Pike, used the word to mean ‘human cattle’, which does appear to be the way the occult hierarchy thinks of us. Another quote that is pertinent to this discussion is from Protocol 12, where we read:

“… we shall set up our own, to all appearance, opposition, which, in at least one of its organs, will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards..”

We can certainly see how the above plays out in the mainstream press and media and I think it would be naive to think that the’ so called’ alternative media’ is any different. As quoted before on this blog and many times elsewhere, Lenin said, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves”. There’s little doubt that this is happening, all that’s open to debate is the scale of it. ‘Controlling the opposition’ allows several things to happen. What information is revealed and how and when it is done so, is determined by the very force that is supposedly being ‘exposed’. There’s been such a great amount of previously ‘suppressed’ information revealed in recent years that it begs the question why and why now? Not all the information being ‘released’ can be classified as disinformation, not by a long way. So what is the role being played by the likes of David Icke, Ian R Crane, Charlie Veitch and others?

To some degree, particularly with regards to Icke, the role seems to be to bring the very idea of there being a ‘conspiracy’ of any sorts into disrepute. There is plenty in Icke’s lectures that is verifiably true. However it gets mixed in with outlandish claims about the ‘elite’, including the British royal family, as being ‘shape shifting lizards’. Throw in some other, equally strange, claims such as the moon being an artificial construct that serves as a base for a group of extraterrestrials that has been manipulating humanity for ‘aeons’ and it’s easy to see why any talk of a ‘New World Order’ is ridiculed by so many people. That’s not to say that Icke and others like him, still don’t attract many followers. Those prepared to ignore the doubts and ridicule and listen to what he has to say at his frequent lectures, or read one of his many books, are treated to an alternative version of ‘reality’ that is made to seem highly plausible, if not true. This is precisely because much of what Icke exposes and talks about is based on the truth. This begs the question, why reveal all this now when it would appear to be of more benefit to keep it all suppressed?

My suspicion or hypothesis, as I’ve partly discussed before, is that much of what purports to be the ‘anti-NWO truth movement’ is little more than a psy(chological)-op(eration) designed to do several things. Before we look at what those might be we should clarify what is meant by the ‘anti-NWO truth movement’. Not only are many of the celebrity ‘truth’ leaders’ controlled but so, it appears, are many of the ‘alternative’ news outlets, let alone the mainstream media ones. Information is fed through these ‘sources’ into the broader ‘truth’ movement where it is either regurgitated or commented on by the many other bloggers (myself included), researchers or activists that are attempting to resist the ‘New World Order’. The distinction then, is between the general ‘anti-NWO truth movement’ and those with a much higher profile. The one’s that are selling books and DVD’s, touring the world giving lectures or who even have their own iPhone app. None of which would be likely or even possible if they truly were a real threat to the established order.

As said previously, it appears that much is being ‘exposed’ on purpose. Writer Michael Hoffman suggests that this is something called the ‘Revelation of the Method’, the purpose of which is the implied consent of the populace. Hoffman’s claim is that:

“…if no resistance is raised when they reveal the truth, the cryptocracy is free to continue to follow their satanic precept, ‘do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.’ In other words, when the cryptocracy reveal their evil manipulations and the majority of the people don’t care, it’s checkmate.”

This theory has more merit if we take the agenda that is unfolding at face value. That is, broadly speaking, that the New World Order develops as expected without any concealed twists or deceptions. It is though likely to be at least a part of how things are being played out. I’ve discussed many of the subjects related to, what is best described as the NWO, with lots of different people. Even with those who have shown an interest and not dismissed the idea completely, there aren’t any that have continued to look into things to any real degree. The idea is that by not resisting or even being so traumatised by events that we accept their ‘solutions’, we have made our choice. That is we have chosen by our own free will the new, Luciferian/Satanic, system being presented to us, though of course it may welll be disguised as something wonderful and the solution to all the problems They created in the first place.

Another context into which I think this ‘revealing’ can be placed is discussed by the Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov. He described the KGB’s functions as being only around 15% traditional ‘spying’ with the rest being more general subversion tactics. He talks about the fourfold process of taking over a country. Step one is to cause a general demoralisation of the population, step two is to begin destabilise it, step three is to cause rebellion or insurgency and step four is the take over process which he describes as ‘normalisation’. I found myself wondering if ‘exposure’ of the ‘NWO’ was being used as a tool to demoralise, destabilise and incite rebellion? As we’ll see it’s certainly possible, if not highly likely. In a similar vein the aim of the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School was to undermine Western culture and values, or in the words of Willi Munzenberg, ‘make the West so corrupt it stinks’. Perhaps the steady stream of negative news stories that emanate from anti-NWO/alternative news sites in many ways serves this purpose. It’s not that most of these stories aren’t true but they serve the purpose of creating negative energy designed to demoralise, destabilise, incite us to anger and rebellion and to steer us in a preprepared direction.

Many of the sources of this ‘news’ fail to offer any concrete solutions beyond the need to blindly rebel. Alex Jones (see first picture) being a good example. He and others are also adept at spreading fear, despondency and hopelessness and leading their followers down many different rabbit holes. Anything but offer concrete solutions. When a solution is proposed it is usually along the lines of the need for us to unite because we are ‘all one consciousness’. David Icke is the perfect example of this. As we saw in the article ‘David Icke Debunked’, based on the film of the same name, Icke ‘exposes’ the NWO then uses this as a tool to herd the newly ‘awakened’ into the very Theosophical, New Age, false utopia that it seems has been the aim all along.

This use of deceptive language or seductive, tempting ideas to manipulate people in a particular direction is an important thing to be very aware of. Perhaps another quote from the ‘Protocols’ can provide us with a good example of how feel good buzzwords and high principles are intentionally misused by the occult oligarchy.

“Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll-parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob.”
“In all corners of the earth the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the GOY States.”
The words ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’ will be instantly recognised as the national motto of France, with its roots in the French revolution. A revolution that, when investigated carefully, appears to have very different causes and aims than the accepted history books suggest. It becomes clear that one or other of the many fronts the occult oligarchy operate through were at work in those times, with freemasonry being, perhaps, the most obvious. This is not the place to dissect that particular event but suffice to say the the study of the French revolution should provide a cautionary tale for all those tempted by violent ‘revolution’.

One more perspective can be gleaned from a section taken from the book ‘The First Global Revolution’, published in 1993 by the globalist think tank, the Club of Rome. The book makes the observation that:

“… divided nations require common enemies to unite them … either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.”

This tactic of creating an external enemy to unite the populace has been used by the occult oligarchy for centuries. One of the benefits, of course, is that while the people’s focus is elsewhere, they don’t have time for thoughts of rebellion against their rulers. Most often these ‘enemies’ have been other countries or peoples. The book comes to the conclusion that ‘because of the sudden absence of traditional enemies, new ones must be identified’.

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

How this fits in with the ‘global warming/climate change’ scam is another story, but what I began to wonder was, is the NWO itself, as perhaps commonly understood, a form of fabricated enemy that is being used to ‘unite’ us? An ‘evil’ NWO that is simultaneously being associated with the Western system in general, with perhaps a specific emphasis on Britain and America? Is this ‘evil’ NWO part of the process of demoralisation and destabilisation? Is it part of an overall effort to get us to ‘rise up’ and ‘bring down the system’? We can see how many elements be they left wing, libertarian, anarchist or anti-NWO are being encouraged to rebel or revolt. If they truly want to bring in a New World Order then the old order has to be destroyed first. Who better to do that than us and by doing so give consent to what replaces it? If the aim is a sort of year zero, a fresh start, a New Order, New Age or New Earth, then all of the old ways need to be jettisoned and done away with. Perhaps this is why so much is being ‘exposed’. It’s all part of the ‘old system’ that is being ‘replaced’ anyway.

Theosophist and Luciferian, Alice A Bailey hinted at this interpretation of the agenda when she said:

“The New World Order must be appropriate to a world which has passed through a destructive crisis and to a humanity which is badly shattered by the experience… [It] must lay the foundation for a future world order which will be possible only after a time of recovery, of reconstruction, and of rebuilding.”

As an aside, with this in mind I remembered something the researcher Alan Watt once said. He said that throughout history the power centres of the ruling elite have periodically shifted. This is done when the old one has been worn out and served its purpose. Before the shift takes place the old centre is subtly destroyed so that it can no pose no threat to the new one. Many suggest that it is Britain that is one of the centres of power in the New World Order agenda and has been for a considerable period. Looking at Britain today it’s hard not to see it as being slowly destroyed, a death by a thousand cuts. Mass immigration is relentless and can only result in the genocide of the English, the main population of the British Isles. Our manufacturing and industry has been slowly exported, our armed forces sacrificed in wars that only serve the occult oligarchy and of course there’s the slow but sure subjugation by the European Union to name but a few of the cuts we are facing. Is this all part of a process that sees Britain, America and by extension Europe and the ‘West’ in general, being set up as a sort of scapegoat for the real New World Order. By this I mean the people of Britain, the indigenous English, Irish, Scottish and Welsh and their democratic, Christian heritage, both of which are targets of the occult hierarchy. At the very least, it’s a possibility that should be considered.

The Freemasons have a motto, ‘Ordo Ab Chao’ which essentially means order out of chaos. The charge is that the chaos will be created by Them so that They can shape the subsequent (New) Order. This seems to be what Bailey is describing in the previous quote. She was a founder of the Lucis Trust, which was originally called the Lucifer Publishing Company. On their website we read of something called ‘World Goodwill’ which is described as an ‘activity’ of theirs. It says:

“World Goodwill is an accredited non-governmental organisation with the Department of Public Information of the United Nations. It maintains informal relations with certain of the Specialised Agencies and with a wide range of national and international non-governmental organisations. World Goodwill is an activity of the Lucis Trust, which is on the Roster of the United Nations Economic and Social Council.”

Elsewhere on the ‘World Goodwill’ page of the Lucis Trust website we read.

“This is a time of preparation not only for a new civilisation and culture in a New World Order, but also for the coming of a new spiritual dispensation.”

I’ve previously equated the ‘evil NWO’ with Orwell’s 1984. This is what we have been trained to think it’s all about. As it develops it creates and puts in place all the necessary building blocks and globalist structures for the real NWO, the false, New Age, utopia. This will be a lot more like Aldous Huxley’s, Brave New World where the majority of humanity has become ‘a population of slaves who do not have to coerced, because they love their servitude’.

Bailey was the third head of the Theosophical society after the Fabian and occultist Annie Besant and the founder of the movement Helena Blavatsky. It’s well documented that Blavatsky revered ‘Lucifer’. She even created and edited a magazine of the same name. In her book ‘The Secret Doctrine’ she wrote:

“Lucifer represents..Life..Thought..Progress..Civilisation..Liberty..Independence.. Lucifer is the Logos.. the Serpent, the Saviour.”

“The Celestial Virgin which thus becomes the Mother of Gods and Devils at one and the same time; for she is the ever-loving beneficent Deity…but in antiquity and reality Lucifer or Luciferius is the name. Lucifer is divine and terrestrial Light, ‘the Holy Ghost’ and ‘Satan’ at one and the same time.”

“It is Satan who is the God of our planet and the only God.”

It is supposed that the ‘destructive’ crises will likely involve some sort of banking and economic collapse that will inevitably be followed by food and energy sources becoming restricted. These in turn will likely trigger violent protests and a greater degree of disorder on the streets. Then there’s what appears to be the seemingly inevitable war in the Middle East, centred around Israel. A war that could easily escalate into a wider World War Three involving Israel, America, Britain (with perhaps a large part of the Commonwealth) and much of Europe on the one side and many Islamic nations supported by China, Russia and a few other nations friendly to them on the other side. I don’t for one minute think that either Islam, China or Russia are ‘anti-NWO’. They are as controlled as any of the countries in the ‘West’. In previous wars it has become apparent that They have controlled both sides and I don’t doubt this will be any different.

A New World (Order) system must involve the uniting of West and East. In order for that to happen a significant number in the West have to become disillusioned with their system and see it as not worth fighting for. A disillusionment in part fed by the ‘alternative media’ as well as the policies being pursued by the political ‘elite’. Out of the ashes (chaos) of the destroyed ‘old order’ (a corrupted, demoralised and degraded ‘West’ masquerading as the New World Order) will rise the ‘phoenix’ that will be the new system. This will be the ‘order’ from Their chaos. In her book ‘A Treatise on the Seven Rays’, Vol. 5, p. 309, Alice A, Bailey states:

“This process whereby civilisation periodically re-makes itself can be profoundly unsettling for those who live through it. This is especially true now, as the process accelerates. Moreover, people now live longer, and may expect to see many more changes in their life than previous generations. So, as the many changes accumulate, they may even come to feel that the civilisation they were born into is dying, and being replaced by something quite alien.”
‘Profoundly unsettling for those who live through it’ reminds of a quote from H. G. Wells in his book, ‘The New World Order’.
“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”
The previous quote from Bailey was used in a section of the Lucis Trust website entitled ‘Phoenix Rising – the Re-birth of Civilisation’ where Bailey further remarked that:
“Dying civilisations are present in their final forms whilst new civilisations are emerging; cycles come and go and in the going overlap”.
Make no mistake our ‘civilisation’ isn’t just dying, it is being intentionally destroyed by the occult oligarchy that Bailey was, if not a part of, then in service to. Many of the problems in the world, particularly the wars, will be largely blamed on nationalism (nation states) and religion, both of which will be seen as ‘problems’ to be solved. This new system will, of course, be sold to us as the end of all wars, justice for all, sharing, equality etc but will actually be the very (Luciferian/Satanic) New Order/Age communitarianism the ruling ‘elite’ wanted all along and have been planning for a very long time. Here it’s worth quoting again from the ‘Protocols’:
“When we have accomplished our coup d’etat we shall say then to the various peoples: ‘Everything has gone terribly badly, all have been worn out with suffering. We are destroying the causes of your torment – nationalities, frontiers, differences of coinages.’”

Yuri Bezmenov described a similar scenario.

“And after crisis, with a violent change in power, structure, and economy, you have the period of so-called normalisation [that] will last indefinitely. Normalisation is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in ’68, Brezhnev said, ‘now brother Czechoslovakia is normalised.’ This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all these schmucks to promise all the goodies and paradise on earth…”

That’s exactly how it seems it will play out on a wider scale. A traumatised humanity promised ‘all the goodies and paradise on earth’, a false utopia or ‘New Age’, will fall into the carefully prepared trap that is the real New World Order. This will be a humanity already brainwashed and indoctrinated into the Satanic/Luciferian occultism of the ‘elite’ by years of propaganda and perception management (brainwashing). This is particularly true of the young, as we saw in the last but one article, ‘The Entire Humanity Must Be Reprogrammed’. In it we read about Dr. Robert Muller, the former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations for 40 years, who is considered by many to be ‘the philosopher of the United Nations’. He set up something called the ‘The Robert Muller School’, officially a branch of The School of Ageless Wisdom, founded in 1974 by Gloria Crook. She was an Alice A. Bailey admirer and one of Muller’s close friends. Muller was responsible for the creation of something called the ‘World Core Curriculum’ that formed the basis and inspiration for the UN’s global education movement. In the preface to the book it says:

“The underlying philosophy upon which The Robert Muller School is based will be found in the teachings set forth in the books of Alice A. Bailey by the Tibetan teacher, Djwhal Khul (published by Lucis Publishing Co.).”

Djwhal Khul
‘Djwhal Khul’ is the ‘ascended master’ said to have dictated many of Bailey’s books. As author Gary Kah pointed out:

“As difficult as it may be to believe, the U.N.’s global education of the future is being openly modelled after the teaching of a Luciferic trance-channeller and her demonic spirit guide.”

On the Robert Muller website we can read the following:

“An educator wrote to me: ‘Through your world core curriculum, the world’s teachers can now have access to the soul of every man, woman and child on this planet.’ I hope this will be the case….. The entire humanity must be reprogrammed through a right global inducation (Latin ex-ducare, to lead out, in-ducare, to lead into).”

This, it seems, is part of the preparation that Bailey spoke about as being necessary ‘for a new civilisation and culture in a New World Order [and] the coming of a new spiritual dispensation.’ A preparation that is taking place, along with much else, under the auspices of the UN.

We can only speculate what the new system will be. Some observers think the end game is for the China/Russia/Islam axis to ‘win’ and for the West to be subsumed into the Communist system. It’s a possibility I suppose. The ruling ‘elite’ have certainly gone a long way towards building China up as an economic and military power. Would this have the desired ‘utopian’ effect though? I somehow doubt it. It would still have large numbers, particularly in the West, fully aware that they were enslaved. Although there are doubts as to the authenticity of the infamous ‘Albert Pike, World War Three’ letter it does give us an insight into how things could play out. Even if it were a forgery it would seem it has been released and distributed to serve a purpose. More ‘revelation of the method’ perhaps? In it we read the following:

“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”

A situation where neither ‘win’ but all are utterly demoralised, exhausted and traumatised seems more likely. If humanity is presented with a new ‘system’ that promises fairness, equality and most of all peace (Liberty, Equality, Fraternity?), the majority will eagerly embrace it, Luciferian or otherwise. At time of incredible crises such as described above most of humanity will have had their paradigms shattered and at such moments all are vulnerable to new ‘programming’.

Another ‘psy-ops’ directed by the ‘ruling elite’ is the Zeitgeist series of films that used something called the Venus Project as a proposed future for mankind. As we saw in the article ‘New Age Communism: The ‘Zeitgeist’ Agenda’ writer Richard Evans described the Zeitgeist/Venus Project ‘solution’ as ‘Communism repackaged to rope in the 21st century truth seeker’. It seems that something along these lines seems far more likely to be the proposed ‘solution’. A cashless, collectivist (communitarian) global system presented as the end to war and ‘fair’ to all. The only way this will be possible is if first the concepts of free trade (capitalism in its true sense as opposed to the monopoly capitalism/cartelism we have today), money (as in cash, notes, coins etc) and nation states are destroyed. All of these things are currently being presented as ‘the problem’ with nation states (and religions) being cited as the main reason for any future Middle East clash and wider, subsequent, conflict. We also have the continuing saga that is the banking and financial system. It appears to be on a ‘life support’ of some sort, kept alive to crash at the opportune moment. By that time nobody will be left in any doubt that it has to ‘change’. That change will be further moves towards a truly global currency and financial system if not the very thing itself. Indeed the banking system, as does the ‘New World Order currently being ‘exposed’, appears to be designed to fail. A huge problem, reaction, solution maybe?

The ‘communitarian’ solution that looks likely to form the political and economic basis of the real New World Order has been described as a synthesis of communism and ‘capitalism’ similar to what has recently developed in China. It’s been suggested that China is a model for the new system, socialism for the masses and monopoly capitalism for the ‘elite’ few. This theory is perhaps bolstered by a quote from David Rockefeller in an article entitled ‘From a China Traveler’, which appeared in the New York Time on August 10, 1973. He wrote:

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”

He wrote it after visiting China earlier that year. It was later in 1973 that he created the globalist organisation the Trilateral Commission. Of course the ‘social experiment’ incurred multiple millions of deaths in China which was then a communist dictatorship. Whether or not China can still be described as communist is debatable but it is still a dictatorship. Regardless this is a system that is greatly admired by globalists and world government advocates such as David Rockefeller.

As hinted at above, there are also spiritual deceptions at play in the ‘exposure’ of the New World Order by the, so called, ‘truth movement’. In fact it seems that it’s the spiritual element of the agenda that is the most important and attracts the most deceptions. Even if I made the claim that I knew what they all were (I certainly don’t) unravelling them in a blog post would be impossible. To a large extent this is an area where we are all on our own and each of us has to make our own mind up. That said there are a few glaringly obvious deceptions and we can, perhaps, get an idea of the general direction that They are trying to steer us, though perhaps not in any great detail.

We’ve already discussed the ‘oneness’ meme, promoted by the likes of David Icke and others. It’s fairly self evident that if you want a world government or new world system that you need to find a way to get people to unite. In much the same way that one of the previous ‘protocols’ quotes highlighted the deceptive misuse of the term ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’ in order to mislead people, it seems a similar play is at work with the cry for ‘oneness’. In the case of Icke, Crane and others this false unity has theosophic (masonic) and new age overtones. Make no mistake, any attempts to reduce or stop altogether the many conflicts in the world is a good thing but that’s very different from the promotion of the idea that ‘we are all one consciousness’. Most, if not all, of those conflicts are either caused by, or greatly exacerbated by, the very occult ‘elite’ that now attempting to provide the ‘solutions’ to them.

Hand in hand with the cries for oneness is the idea we are all about to experience a ‘consciousness shift’. This is heavily tied in with the general new age movement but more specifically with the ‘end of the Mayan calendar/2012 meme. One of the features of this deception is that what we are witnessing now is just the old order crumbling away and the painful birth pangs of a wondrous new (order) age. In fact we don’t have to do anything about the old order and their attempts at world control because they are destined to fail. A careful reading of this sees that it ties in with the theory outlined above. That is the New Word Order, as presented to us today, is being equated with the old order and that it is intended to fail. When it does the real New World Order or New Age will arrive.

Tony Blair once said, in a speech entitled ‘Faith and Globalisation’, that:

“… the forces shaping the world at this moment are so strong and all tend in one direction.”

They are strong and tending in one direction because they are part of the occult oligarchy’s drive to create a New World Order. The forces may be either spiritual or worldly but they are all moving the same way under the control and guidance of the ruling ‘elite’. Whether it be the ‘oneness’ meme, mass immigration, the EU or the global warming scam, they are all part of the same, truly evil, agenda.

Blair is a willing and key servant of this occult oligarchy. He served his globalist masters well during his time as Prime Minister of Britain and he’s continued to do so since he left. One of his new roles is the creation of the ‘Tony Blair Faith Foundation’. Unsurprisingly we read the usual feel-good platitudes that his foundation aims to promote ‘respect and understanding’ between the world’s religions. All well and good you might think but look a little deeper and it’s clear that there’s more going on here than meets they eye. It has to be seen in the context of the ecumenical drive for the unifying of the world’s religions. This movement is seen by many as being led by Rome.

The fact that Tony Blair converted to Roman catholicism when he left office does little to cast doubts on this.

If a unity of the world’s religions is to take place then it’s inevitable that this will involve a form of compromise. In the speech mentioned above Blair spoke of the ‘extremist and exclusionary tendency’ within religions. We can already begin to see that anyone who resists this process is likely to be labelled with similar terms. From David Icke and the Zeitgeist films within the ‘truth movement’ and elsewhere within the broader new age movement, we’ve seen attempts to undermine and discredit Christianity. Of course the attempts by Zeitgeist and others have been thoroughly debunked but it does serve to show how Christianity, if not Jesus himself, is a target of the occultists. Realising this is only part of the story though, Christianity has itself been infiltrated and false teachers abound. Of course the Bible predicts that such events would occur but even so, seeing clearly through the many deceptions is far from easy.

One of the areas used to deceive that is relevant to what we’re discussing here is the interpretation of Biblical prophecy. This area has long been debated and has an interesting history. Most, if not all, of the main protagonists in the Protestant Reformation pointed to the Papacy as being anti-Christ, a view with which many still concur. They had what was broadly referred to as a ‘historical’ view of prophecy. That saw it as an unfolding process throughout history that would culminate in the future with Jesus Christ’s second coming. Essentially there were two other interpretations, ‘preterism’ and ‘futurism’. The preterist sees all, or most, of prophecy as having already happened whilst the futurist sees almost all of it as happening in the future. Discussing the various elements of all three beliefs would take far too long. One thing that is significant though is that although the historical view was once the most widespread, that has now been replaced with a futurist or dispensationalist interpretation. Part of this view sees the creation of the state of Israel as evidence of prophecy unfolding. The futurist model, broadly speaking, foretells of a coming one-world dictator, the anti-Christ, who will makes a Treaty or Covenant with the ‘Jews’, then break it after 31/2 years and who is then worshipped in a rebuilt Jewish Temple, from which he will impose the Mark of the Beast. If nothing else I’ve come to the conclusion that this is an incorrect view of prophecy and is being used to deceive. It’s not the only part but it is does seem to be an important element of the ‘end times’ delusion. It’s worth noting that it seems a key aim of freemasonry is to see a rebuilt Temple of Solomon and this interpretation of prophecy does appear to be a possible way to bring this about. There’s strong evidence that suggests that Israel and Jerusalem in particular, is intended to be the spiritual centre of the proposed new world system.

Even if you’re not a Bible believer it’s worth considering that the ‘forces shaping this world’ may be using a false interpretation of prophecy to help bring about their aims. To not get caught up in the deceptions that are likely to abound will take a great deal of discernment by each and every one of us. As has been noted earlier and in several of the articles on this blog Alice A Bailey, the third leader of the theosophists, has played and through her legacy continues to play, a decisive role in the spiritual dimension of the New World Order agenda. On the Lucis Trust website we read:

‘Maitreya’ allegedly appearing
before crowds in Nairobi in 1988
“Humanity is not following an uncharted course. There is a divine Plan in the Cosmos of which we are a part. At the end of an age human resources and established institutions seem inadequate to meet world needs and problems. At such a time the advent of a Teacher, a spiritual leader or Avatar, is anticipated and invoked by the masses of humanity in all parts of the world….. Today the reappearance of the World Teacher, the Christ, is expected by millions, not only by those of Christian faith but by those of every faith who expect the Avatar under other names — the Lord Maitreya, Krishna, Messiah, Imam Mahdi and the Bodhisattva.”

Of course Christianity is expecting the return of Jesus Christ and not the false ‘christ’ suggested by Bailey. It seems though that some sort of spiritual leader may well be presented as the saviour of a humanity traumatised by war and a whole host of other ‘tribulations’. Taking this, the focus on Israel and the rebuilding of the Temple and the drive to unite the religions all into account, there’s another possible scenario to look out for. The author of this article attended a lecture by someone called Bill Lambert who was the ‘New England Director of the House of Theosophy’. The lecture was entitled ‘Possible and Probable Events in the Future’. Amongst other revelations, what was foreseen was the building of a combined Temple, Church and Mosque in Jerusalem where the Theosophical ‘christ’ would be received. This scenario would obviously come about only after Alice A Baliley’s ‘destructive crisis’ had swept the world and would form part of her ‘period of reconstruction’. Such an endeavour makes more sense in terms of trying to unite the world’s religions in a new ‘one world’ system.

The issue of being directed by ‘entities’ is a long and difficult one. As well as guiding the likes of Bailey and her predecessor Blavatsky, we’ve also seen that they are ‘guiding’ many that are involved in the new age, 2012 and truth movements. People such as David Icke, Jordan Maxwell and David Wilcock all purport to be in contact with ‘entities’. Whether they be ascended masters, Ra or the Pleiadians they all seem to be saying a similar thing and attempting to move humanity in a particular direction. By their fruits shall ye know them and the deceptive nature of these ‘entities’ lends support to the idea that they are demonic spirits. A difficult concept to grasp for sure but one that the evidence suggests could well be true. When we look at how the entities, said to be guiding David Icke, are supposedly exposing the New World Order it seems there is only one conclusion. It is being deliberately revealed and simultaneously associated with the current systems of government, mainly in the ‘Western’ world. We are at the same time being encouraged to ‘unite’ (into one) and ‘rise up’ against this evil New World Order in order to destroy it. This process will contribute to the chaos out of which the Freemasonic/Theosophic, Satanic/Luciferian order will be imposed. The ‘evil’ New World Order’s role is really to put in place the apparatus for the real one which is the false utopia that will be presented after whatever cataclysms and crises they’ve got lined up and the ‘evil’ New World Order has been ‘defeated’. As well as being constantly fed with information about this ‘evil’ New World Order many are at the same time being simultaneously steered towards a sort of New Age/Masonic/Theosophic way of thinking. This will in turn form part of the new, occult, spiritual system of the New Age. Some have observed that this is what Bailey described as the ‘Externalisation of the Hierarchy’.

Anyone reading this may well say, what can we do. I only wish I had some concrete answers. The problem that faces us is that the majority dismiss the idea of there being any sort of conspiracy. Their rebellion, if at all, will be of a purely political nature and to a large extent of the left wing variety. It’s here I should mention one other, possible, twist in the tale. Writer Lee Penn sees the possibility that whilst at the moment most may see the danger as coming from a ‘leftist’ and ‘new age’ New World Order that an ‘unexpected peril’ may well be the emergence of a ‘rightist’ seemingly Christian one. This is essentially a variation on the idea of a false New World Order being seen to be ‘defeated’ then replaced by the false utopia planned all along. This theory sees the occult, theosophic and new age elements also ‘exposed’ and and a swing in the, seemingly, opposite direction is then manipulated. This ‘Christian’ New World Order would be an inversion of true Christianity and would take the form of a sort of theocratic dictatorship that promised to save us from the New World Order. Penn quotes the writer C.S. Lewis as saying:

“The loftier the pretensions of the power, the more meddlesome, inhuman, and oppressive it will be. Theocracy is the worst of all possible governments… ”

He also refers to Matthew 24: 24 in the Bible:

“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect”

The point being that Biblical prophecy says that many true Christians will be deceived during the ‘end times’ and the scenario outlined by Penn is one way in which this might happen.

So what can we do. We appear to face a ‘hydra-headed’ monster that operates through numerous fronts. Those willing to do the research are faced with a, sometimes, bewildering amount of information and theories that shows any number of groups or organisations involved in the agenda. It seems that, to a large degree, this has been done on purpose and is part of the game being played. Some will say the capstone is the hierarchy of the Vatican, along with the likes of the Jesuits and the Knights of Malta. Others say it’s the Zionists, the Talmudic and Cabbalistic Jewish elite along with the international bankers, possibly including the British Israel movement. It seems that somehow the Crown or City of London fits into this nexus, along with the royal and aristocratic bloodline families, mainly of Europe, perhaps with the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha’s, our won royal family, at the top of that particular tree. Then there’s the secret society networks that include certain Freemasonic groups as well as the likes of Skull and Bones or the Ordo Templi Orientis. On a political level some will point to international communism or the Fabian socialists. Then there are the numerous organisations and think tanks such as the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Club of Rome, funded by the multi-billionaire ‘capitalists’ such as the Rockefellers. Essentially, it seems they are all, on one level, controlled and part of the same agenda. These are the ‘forces’ Tony Blair said were shaping the world. The question debated is who controls who? Can we know for sure? I’m not sure we can. My own best guess is that we can look to the Bible for an idea of what it is we face. A synthesis of the ‘Synagogue of Satan’ (those who ‘say they are Jews, and are not’) and ‘Rome’ with both having their roots in Babylon and in conjunction with the ‘bloodlines’.

Attempts to ‘take on’ these forces at the current time may well be doomed to failure if for no other reason than the majority of people would dismiss the idea of there being an agenda of any sort, let alone the people mentioned being involved. There’s a far greater appetite for some sort of major political change because most can’t see past that level of control. The levers of power are pulled at a much higher level than a mere politician. Any solution that doesn’t acknowledge that isn’t going to meet with any real success.

On an individual level we can strive and even pray for, discernment in the coming tribulations. Each one of us has to come to our own conclusions about what we face and how we can avoid the carefully prepared traps. Any collective solution is hampered by the numerous deceptions that abound. My own thoughts are that instead of some sort of direct action against those we perceive as being the New World Order architects we should try and ‘call their bluff’, so to speak. Instead of just blindly rebelling without any real thoughts to a workable alternative we would need a clear idea of what it is we were fighting for. Perhaps a declaration, modelled on the American Declaration of Independence, could be sought. A document that not only stated what our aims were but also the reasons why the declaration was necessary. A secondary document could then provide the evidence for those stated reasons. Part of the original declaration would have to acknowledge the need for a constitutional review of some sort. The Chartists movement of the 19th century could provide inspiration. One example of such an effort appears to be already happening, though it appears unlikely that the ‘hidden hand’ of the ruling occult ‘elite’ has been acknowledged. It is still worth keeping an eye on though. Although there are groups, such as the BCG, out there encouraging a return to our constitution it’s by no means clear that that constitution has ever truly served the interests of us all or whether it was for the benefit of just the elect few.

This would be no easy task at the best of times and it’s beyond my capabilities to attempt to draft anything that would suffice. Collectively this might be possible but by whom and how. As we’ve seen we are being encouraged to rise up, rebel and revolt. This is seen as necessary because of what’s wrong rather than being driven by a clear vision of an alternative to the current malaise. A blind rebellion can only play into the hands of the occult oligarchy. A declaration with which, if not all but at least most, agreed could serve as a rallying point and attempts to fulfil it could be made without resort to violence. Any suggestions along these lines would be gratefully received. In the meantime we can only educate ourselves and attempt to unravel the tangled web that has been woven.

If even a small number manage to see through the innumerable layers of deception then we may yet have a chance of defeating the New World Order dream of the occultists who control this world. Returning to Bible prophecy there’s many who will be aware that something, at least very similar to what is happening now, is predicted in there. As mentioned earlier it does appear that there’s an attempt by the ruling ‘elite’ to make a version of it seem to be coming ‘true’. What then of the real thing. In recent months I’ve found myself drawn ever closer to the words and teachings of Jesus, particularly in the Gospels. A situation I never dreamt possible not too long ago. It’s a Christianity not reflected in the organised churches, especially in the Catholic Church or Church of England. I’ve no qualms in saying that we are in, what can only be described as, a battle between good and evil. Perhaps even a battle for the soul and destiny of mankind. So should I, or anyone professing to be a Christian, just sit back and wait for prophecy to unfold? Safe in the knowledge that Satan (the opposer) will eventually get his just deserts. It seems to me the answer is no. Firstly it would be incorrect to assume that these are the predicted ‘end times’, which is not to say that we shouldn’t be alert to the possibility that they are. Evil is always to be resisted and the unnecessary wars, false flag ‘terrorist’ attacks, engineered economic and banking ‘collapses’, wholesale brainwashing of the population, lies, deceit and manipulations of our self appointed ‘elite’ rulers can’t be described as anything but evil. How we resist is for us all to decide for ourselves, but we must all be very wary of not inadvertently serving the very cause we thought we were opposing.

These are times like no other. When I survey the world around me, particularly ‘modern’ Britain, I really can’t help but feel that only divine intervention can help us now.

Marxist College Professor Claims Nobody Was Murdered By Stalin

I’m struggling to understand, you can deny that Jesus is the Messiah, deny that the jewish bolsheviks killed 10’s of millions of people in the USSR, but question the official holocaust story and you are thrown in prison? I would encourage everyone to read Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn it is one of the best books I have ever read and certainly the best on the subject.

Beware Of Billionaires Bearing Gifts

This is a rare article from Forbes, reposted here to prevent it being destroyed.

By Richard C. Morals
Forbes, April 1997

IF YOU’VE DIMLY wondered what is happening in
Albania, we can, in a brief sentence, explain:
George Soros’ friends are coming out on top.
Late in February, armed gangs led by gangsters and
ex-Communists, many of them veterans of the old
secret police state, all but toppled an elected
liberal government, and forced the president to
appoint a neoCommunist as prime minister. While
this was happening, George Soros sat in his London
town house and calmly told FORBES that his
A!banian Foundation is “an excellent group very
much on top of the situation.”

On top is right: Soros has kept afloat a
newspaper, Koha Jone, that egged on the coupists
with inflammatory antigovernment propaganda. A
pyramid scheme had collapsed, costing many people
their savings, and the Soros-supported paper
effectively made a call to arms. A top official of
the Soros foundation in Tirana boasted to stunned
observers: “[President] Berisha’s going. We got
him.”

In an age-old tradition of European political
patronage, this multibillionaire speculator
routinely taps his billions to fund journals,
politicians and educators in Europe and elsewhere.
More often than not, these have an exclusively
left-wing bias.

Soros, 67, is Hungarian-born but a U.S. citizen.
He recently caused a flutter in the February issue
of the Atlantic Monthly by penning a windy attack
on free market capitalism.
Why is George Soros so cozy with people and causes
that might be expected to view his kind as
parasites?

To understand his charitable works Forbes visited
the Soros FoundationHungary’s cream-colored villa
in the hills of Budapest. Hungary is not only
Soros’ native land but where his charities have
the longest history. There we met Miklos
Vasarhelyi, the 80year-old president of the
Sorosfunded foundation. This man, who dispenses
millions of dollars a year in a rather poor
country, has an intcresting past. Vasarhelyi was
press officer to Imre Nagy, the Communist Prime
Minister exccuted in 1958 for being too
independent. Vasarhelyi stood trial along with
Nagy after Soviet tanks crushed the 1956 Hungarian
uprising. Nagy and most others were hanged or
sentenced to life. Vasarhelyi got just five years,
the lightest punishmcnt of the pack.

Thanks to George Soros, this former Communist has
risen again. A political party he helped found is
a partner in the present government. That
government is a coalition of ex-Communists (now
the Hungarian Socialist Party) and a leftlibcral
group, the Alliance of Free Democrats, a coalition
that came to power in 1994 after defeating a
rather ineffectual moderate government. Soros
blessed the election results.

“These are strong, serious-minded people,” he
publicly said of the victorious ex-Communists. “I
have great expectations in general.” Not everyone
agreed. One prominent foreign businessman who
first considered, then rejected, doing business in
Hungary, described the current government as a
“bunch of clowns who haven’t a clue as to how
to run an ecconomy.”

Soros has since banged heads with Socialist Prime
Minister Gyula Horn, but remains close to his
coalition partner, the Alliance of Free Democrats.
He provides many AFD leaders with income. Besides
Vasarhelyi, for example, Soros’ Hungarian lawyer,
Alajos Dorubach, is a top-ranked AFD official and
a legal adviser to the foundation.

Soros is the great philanthropist of our age–or
so his press constantly remind us. Every year,
according to his flacks, he gives away more than
$300 million through a network of 1,000 employees
in 30 countries. When Russian scientists were
starving he gave each a year’s salary; he brought
fresh water to besieged Bosnians; he’s providing
kindergartens for Gypsies. Good deeds, all.

But there is another side to the giving, a rathcr
nutty political side. The 50 offices maintained by
Soros money are spread from Haiti to Mongolia, and
all claim that their works are based on
philosopher Sir Karl Popper’s views of tolerant,
open societies. Thus a common name: Open Society
Institute.

Behind the nuttiness, there is a consistency. “The
people Soros hires,” says Mark Almond, a respected
Oxford University lecturer, “are noted for their
anti-Thatcherite views. You’ll be hard-pressed to
find a religious dissident or staunch
anti-Communist in his foundations.”

Johnathan Sunley, the Budapestbased director of
The Windsor Group, puts it even more strongly:
“Soros is engaged in a one-dimensional ideological
laundering of the old Communist/nomenklatura at
the expense of those who didn’t get trips abroad.”
Sunley means, of course, that real anti-Communists
couldn’t travel abroad in Communist days; only
those in official favor could. Soros has adopted
many of these formerly pampered, generally
moderate Marxists.

Johnathan Sunley, The Windsor Group Conservatives
like Sunley say Soros Is “laundering” former
Communists.

“Soros,” says Peter Bod, a former cabinet minister
and central bank governor in Hungary, “is the most
influential nonelected politician east of the
Alps.” His power stems not from the ballot box but
from his bank account. He wants to see that the
old left-wing dictatorships are replaced–not with
free market democracies, but with left-wing
democracies.

“Yes,” the prickly billionaire conceded in an
interview with FORBES, “clearly there is a
political bias in the [Soros] foundation.”

Look at the trustees of his U.S. foundation and
you will see where the bias lies. One of them is
the notorious Lani Guinier, the law professor Bill
Clinton tried to nominate as head of the civil
rights division of the Justice Department. Once
her intemperate brand of politics was
examined–such as minority veto power over
legislation–even Clinton backed away from her
and withdrew his support.

“Yes,” says the prickly billionaire. “Clearly
there is a political bias in the [Soros]
foundation.”

President of the Open Society Institute in the
U.S. is Aryeh Neier, a human rights advocate who
often embraces extreme liberal positions.
So be careful when you apply the term
“philanthropy” to Soros’ spending. Not all his
causes are political, but he’s clearly a would-bc
social engineer. You wouldn’t get far in a U.S.
election running on a Soros-style platform, but
you might feel quite at home in a lot of U.S.
universities.

But back to Hungary. Soros has been working in his
native Hungary for the past 13 years. In the early
1980s he was quietly supporting dissidents in
Central and Eastern Europe. It was then that the
mercurial Vasarhelyi showed up at Columbia
University in New York, where he met Soros. The
ex-Communist hack seems to have had a considerable
influence on the billionaire. With Vasarhelyi’s
help Soros made a deal in 1984 with the
then-government. The first Soros Hungarian
foundation had a budget of $3 million and was
jointly run by Soros and the Communists. “One of
Soros’ conditions was that I should be his
personal representative,” says Vasarhelyi. “He had
excellent judgment,” says Soros, “and a good
understanding of what was possible and what
wasn’t.”

Interesting guy. Vasarhelyi’s understanding of
what is possible has undergone a number of
changes. In 1936 and 1937 he studied political
science in Rome because he thought “Italian
Fascism showed the way out of an unjust society.”
He secretly joined the Hungarian Communist Party
in 1939 and officially became a member of the
Social Democratic Party. “[The Communist Party]
instructed [me] to join the Social Democratic
Party,” he wrote in his 1989 autobiography, “to
try and get a hold of key positions, but to
continue following the leadership of the Communist
Party.”

By the late 1940s the Communists ruled Hungary and
Vasarhelyi became a top-ranked “journalist”
spouting pure Communist propaganda. Then he turned
his coat again. By the mid1950s, he had joined
the ranks of “goulash” Communists disenchanted by
Stalinism, but still in love with Karl Marx. After
serving his relatively mild prison term,
Vasarhelyi eventually got a job at a literature
academy, was given a passport and allowed to
travel. The dissidents we talked to said
dissidents normally didn’t get such perks. Says
OSI’s Neier: “We always regarded him as strongly
committed to the Open Society principles, and he
is held in high regard.”

Everyone likes Vasarhelyi. References to him are
to be found in recently released internal records
of Communist Party meetings about a 1989 political
demonstration. Vasarhelyi and others negotiated
with the government on behalf of the dissidents.
According to the records: “it is worth talking
to…Vasarhelyi on whom we have influence” and “if
the [speeches] get into Vasarhelyi’s hands we
would be able to get ahold of them.” Vasarhelyi
strenuously denies collaborating with the
Communists.

Maybe that was wishful thinking, but it’s a
revealing comment nonetheless. Vasarhelyi of
course no longer calls himselfa Communist but
neither is he a big believer in free markets. “I
was and always am very critical of capitalism,”
Vasarhelyi tells FORBEs.

Give Soros credit. His money does do considerable
good. Between 1984 and 1989 he and Vasarhelyi
helped uudermine the Communist Party’s control of
information by trading photocopying machines to
cultural and educational institutes for Hungarian
currency; the currency was then used to give
grants to dissidents and to writers of all
political stripes.

But along the way Soros seems to have developed
delusions of grandeur. He wasn’t satisfied with
helping end Communist totalitarianism. He wanted
to decide what kind of government would replace
it. In 1990 a new center-right coalition
government was voted into power in Hungary which
killed the Soros-government agreement. That’s when
the foundation began its partisan support.
Vasarhelyi denies that there is any political bias
in his foundation. The Soros Foundation, for
example, gives to the youth clubs and pays for
Gypsy dance troupes (the Gypsies are a repressed
minority in Europe).

A press officer told us over a five-star buffet we
should see what Soros “means to the little
people.”

Gabor Ivanyi is a former AFD member of parliament,
and a Methodist minister who runs homeless
shelters in Budapest. Last year Soros Foundation
Hungary gave Ivanyi $38,000 for mattresses, an
ambulance to pick up homeless who were freezing on
the streets and for TB treatments. Ivanyi is a
genuine man of goodwill.

But study the foundation’s 1980s modus operandi
and you’ll see it always mixed applauded works
with politically motivated projects. With
Vasarhelyi’s AFD pals in power again, we found the
relationship with certain sectors of governmerit
very cozy. The AFD-controlled culture ministry and
the Soros foundation, for example, both subsidize
periodicals. We matched the most recently
published lists of subsidies and found 77% of the
periodicals that got major government handouts
also received subsidies from the Soros
foundation. It seems to us a foundation dedicated
to an Open Society would go out of its way to
assist periodicals not supported by the government
of the day.

How reformed are Soros’ ex-Communists? Not very. A
few years back, Gyorgy Litvan, a Soros friend of
longstanding, a former adviser to the
foundation’s board and director of an institute
given Soros’ grants, attacked historian Maria
Schmidt. She had uncovered secret police files
indirectly confirming that Alger Hiss had been a
Soviet spy. Her work was widely published in the
U.S. and led to a Reader’s Digest article in
Hungary. Then she bumped into Litvan. Schmidt says
Litvan lambasted her for her “mentality,” and said
he would do everything he could to stop her
working as an academic in Hungary.

Litvan tells FORBES he never said such a thing,
but admits he used his power to block her from
making a documentary on the secret police. “I
dislike her,” he says. “She is on the far right.”
This Soros friend has an interesting idea of what
constitutes “far fight.” It seems to be anyone to
the right of Alger Hiss.

Interviewing him in London, FORBEs asked Soros
why he supports turncoats likc Litvan and
Vasarhelyi. His reply was–shall we say–a bit
confusing. “They [as exCommunists] know better
what democracy is than perhaps those who were
always opposed to [the regime].” What an insult to
those true democrats who paid, sometimes with
theirlives, for their beliefs.

That’s outrageous, typical Soros gobbledygook.
Exactly what does he believe in? A utopian vision
of a sort of borderless, multicultural world,
where people respect one another and the
well-to-do take care of the lesswell-off. But
Soros’ friend Byron Wien, managing director of
Morgan Stanley International, comes closer to the
truth when he says: “Soros is terrified of
right-wing nationalism.”

Understandable perhaps in a man who spent his
boyhood watching Nazis aud their Hungarian
supporters at work. In testimony to the U.S.
Congress in 1994, Soros insisted that Eastern
Europe’s ex-Communists “want to get away from
Communism as far as possible. Their reemergence
constitutes a welcome extension of the democratic
spectrum.” Soros went on: “The real danger is the
emergence of would-be nationalist dictatorships.
They are playing in a field definitely tilted in
their favor.”

Thus, for Soros, a rosy glow seems to surround the
left, while conservatism seems, to him, a stand-in
for Nazism. That may seem relatively benign when
expoundcd in American universities. It is pure
poison in Eastern and Central Europe, which badly
need to develop their free markets.

Soros annually pumps some $60 million into
outfits in Hungary, among them his Central
European University, whose goal is to educate an
“administrative elite.” Here students can not only
bone up on macroeconomics but also on such
American imports as feminist literary theory and
how the media “constructs gender and sexuality,
whether heterosexual or homosexual.”

We found Soros’ “cultural elite” unbelievably
arrogant. A chirpy Open Society Institute press
officer told us over a five-star Kempinski Hotel
breakfast that she wanted FORBES to see what Soros
“means to the little people.”

Vatlay Klaus, the Czech Republics prime minister
and a tireless advocate of free markets, has a
good notion of what Soros’ ideas mean to “the
little people.” Klaus, in effect, kicked Central
European University out of Prague. The no-nonsense
Klaus wasn’t afraid of Soros’ ideas. He just
didn’t want Soros money buying up Czech
intellectuals.

Soros returned the insult: “Klaus embodies the
worst of the Western democracies.” Maybe, but
the Czech Republic is easily the most prosperous,
modern economy in Central or Eastern Europe.

Say this for Soros: He knows his way around the
law. His country foundations are usually local
legal entities but often receive funds, says his
New York press officer, from the New
York-domiciled foundations. That’s very
interesting.

According to the IRS tax code, to enjoy tax-exempt
status a private foundation cannot “intervene,
directly or indirectly, in any political campaign
on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate
for public office …. “

You can dismiss George Soros as a kooky rich man
who uses his money to collect politicians and
intellectuals the way some rich people collect
castles and old masters. And in a way he is
ridiculous, flying about the world, holding press
conferences and writing books and articles that
nobody can understand.

On the other hand, money can do a lot of harm in
politics, especially in poor, small countries.

Instability

IN BUDAPEST in 1944 George Soros lived a double
life. His father, a lawyer and editor of a journal
in Esperanto (a now almost forgotten effort to
develop a common language for the world), forged
official papers to disguise the family’s Jewish
heritage. The papers saved the family, and during
the Nazi occupation, when German and Hungarian
fascist allies rounded up 300,000 Jews, young
Soros posed as the Christian godson of a Hungarian
government official. The 14-year-old George Soros
sometimes found himself accompanying his supposed
godfather as he seized the property of Jewish
families bound for slaughter.

Heroic? No, but how many heroes are there when
survival is the issue and resistance futile? It’s
typical of Soros that he purports to remember that
time not as a terrifying ordeal but as an
adventure. “The happiest year of my life,” he
calls it.

Read George Soros’ frank personal statements and
meet the billionaire in his elegant but slightly
tatty London home-light switches falling out of
the wall, piles of laundry on the bathroom
floor–and you can’t help but rather like the man.
Yet sometimes the openness seems a bit phony.
Example: After George Soros challenged Europe’s
Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992, becoming the “man
who broke the Bank of England” and probably the
first person to make $1 billion in a month, he
lectured: “It behooves the authorities to design a
system that does not reward speculators.” Yeah, I
did it, but you shouldn’t have let me. It’s the
system. So he’s a capitalist but hedges his bets
by supporting socialist causes.

The key to understanding George Soros is that he
skirts, by his own admission, a kind of lunacy.
It’s both his strong point and his weak point.
“Next to my fantasies about being God,” Soros told
British television, “I also have very strong
fantasies of being mad. In fact, my grandfather
was actually paranoid. I have a lot of madness in
my family. So far I have escaped it.” Just.

One bout of instability came in the early 1980s.
His fund was doing extremely well when he walked
away from his partner, first wife and family. It
was a “very intense emotional process to correct
errors [in the financial markets],” he explains.
“The psychic cost of running the fund was very
high. The more successful I was, the more I was
punished by having more money to run.”

During this turmoil Soros walked through the City
of London and was convinced–wrongly-that he was
having a heart attack. “It made me realize that
maybe it wasn’t worth it. To have a heart attack
and be knocked out is really losing the game.”
He spent a few years devoting himself to his
intellectual and charitable interests, remarried
and eventually pulled off his greatest financial
coup by betting against the British pound.

Unable to resist pondering his navel, eager to
dazzle with his erudition, Soros has produced
several books, all impenetrable to the point where
some people think he is pulling their leg. His
recently published Atlantic Monthly article, “The
Capitalist Threat,” is a collection of pretentious
and incomprehensible musings about capitalism, the
implication being that, though he didn’t mention
them by name,’ Reagan and Thatcher were bad guys.
“The article was misunderstood,” he says. “I was
not attacking the capitalist system. I was
attacking the excesses of the capitalist system.”

Oh. When he went through his personal crisis in
the early 1980s, he says he felt he was acting out
the conflict between his parents. We couldn’t
resist asking: Are you projecting onto capitalism
and the financial markets your own personal
anxieties?

“Maybe so,” he answered. “The insecurity I feel
actually corresponds to the conditions in the
market better than the equilibrium that the
professors of economics deal with.”

Looking into himself, Soros sees the world.
Looking at the world, he sees–George Soros.
Madness is close to genius.