Written by Green Arrow
Been a very busy and illuminating time for me over the past five or six days – and I must confess that by the time I had considered myself well enough informed to write about what follows, my ageing brain was almost overloaded with the amount of information I had to upload into it before processing it.
As is usual, the title of the article gives you a clue towards the contents of the article and I am sure that it is going to have some of you “fluffy nationalists” foaming at the mouth like Weyman Bennett speaking at a David Cameron endorsed UAF meeting.
Now I have heard the analogy, that the True British people are not yet ready for the truth and that we must spoon-feed them like babies. Feed them with little mouthfuls of truth like tiny infants until they can move onto “real” food at some unspecified date in the way distant future. Now this is a philosophy that I once subscribed to. I was wrong – I am often wrong but I learn in the end and usually the hard way – which is sometimes the best way to learn.
All we have done by NOT telling the WHOLE truth and feeding the public baby food instead of good British Beef packed full of truth, is turn out a generation of wimps, girlie boys, perverts, cowards and appeasers, like those found in the Zionist puppet British Freedom Party, whose homosexual division (seriously) have wet themselves with excitement over the fact that some shite Asian Magazine for the colonisers of Our Country, have said that the BFP and their pro Israeli English Defence League (name derived from the Jewish Defence League) have said they are not racists. Well they damn well should be – but licking arse (or should I use the more publicly palatable word “Rimming“) is what the British Freedom Party are all about, so we should not be surprised.
Now I know that this site is read by many who already know the truth but regrettably instead of writing about it and sending in articles to reach a bigger audience, they are happy just to have the occasional comment published. That must stop. Write those bloody articles and send them in.
Meanwhile, I shall now attempt to force feed those of you who have been sucking up the brain numbing pap that others want to feed you to keep you weak, a good portion of Truth that will, if your stomachs are strong enough to digest, make you much much stronger.
Now then, a quick reminder of just who the Rothschilds are and how they started off on their quest to own the world with the connivance of other Jews and corrupt goyim/cattle and to enslave the non-Jews who live on its surface. I shall, of course be accused of being anti-Semitic for publishing this but so be it. Truth is, by the end of the article, I will be probably be accused of being a Nazi and I do not have a problem with that either.
The founder of the House of Rothschild was Mayer Anselm Bauer, a money lender who traded under the sign of a red shield (Rothschild), in Jew Street, Frankfurt. Using money embezzled from William of Hesse, Mayer set up branches of the House of Rothschild in Berlin, Vienna, Paris, Naples and London.
Bauer, now with his name changed to, Rothschild placed a son in charge of each of the overseas branches. Amschel in Berlin, Salomon in Vienna, Jacob in Paris, Kalmann in Naples, whilst Nathan set up the headquarters of the House of Rothschild in London, where it remains today.
The Rothschilds were now superbly placed to take their first steps in stealing the wealth of the world. They knew that the best and most secure way of making money was to lend it to governments – especially to governments who were at war, who would agree to any terms the bankers demanded so long as they had the money to fight their wars.
Napoleon’s early rise was secretly funded by the Rothschilds who wanted a war that would enrich them beyond a normal persons dreams and when Napoleon discovered the painful truth about who controlled him and why: “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild. Napoleon threw of their shackles and that sealed his fate, the destruction of his Grande Armee and his future murder by Rothschild agents, who used arsenic to poison him whilst he was imprisoned on the island of Saint Helena.
When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” – Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France, 1815
Now if you do your own research, you will discover that as well as the Napoleonic Wars, the Rothschilds Dynasty have encouraged, incited and funded wars that could NEVER have taken place without them and the magic money (fractional banking) created out of NOTHING.
The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is, perhaps, the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banks can in fact inflate, mint and un-mint the modern ledger-entry currency.” Major L L B Angus.
Money used to start wars in which untold millions of white people have died just to enrich Jewish Bankers as individuals and advance World Jewry’s quest to rule the world by owning all of it whilst destroying Nations and political parties that speak out against their evil plan and encouraging and funding political parties that misguidedly or knowingly support the Zionist cause.
- The rise of Napoleon I as the chosen Rothschild agent for toppling of the Monarchs of Europe;
- The fall of the Romanov Dynasty and the destruction of Christian Russia at the hands of the Bolshevik Communists;
- The Anglo-Boer War of genocide, a most important war at the turn of the 19th century that was swept under the carpet.
- The Great War 1914-1918
- The 2nd World War 193(2)9 – 1945. World Jews declare war on Germany
- The War against the Palestinian People
- The illegal War against Serbia
- The illegal War against Afghanistan
- The illegal War against Iraq
- The illegal War against Lybia
- The coming illegal Wars against Syria and Iran.
Now it is estimated that the Rothschilds own over 60% of the worlds wealth. During the chaos of wars and depression they ALWAYS convert their worthless paper money into tangible assets such as gold, islands, land and property, and in the past were proud to boast of their achievements, but a few decades ago they realised that even the most stupid of cattle were beginning to be aware of their machinations – they have become far more secretive and few people realise that most major companies such as Sun Alliance are owned by them and that their wealth is now greater than that of many large nations.
Regular readers and trackers of Zionism already know that 96% of the World Media, including Hollywood is controlled by Jews and has been for decades although they are constantly trying to deny this through their lick-spittle agents of the Jewish run Anti-Defamation League.
As a break from reading hundreds of links on the Rothschilds, I took time out to watch some old black and white movies that are now out of copyright and therefore free to download and so I am going to ask that you take the time out to watch them after you have finished reading this article or later when you have time.
The first film is The House of Rothschild that was produced and directed by Jews and released in 1934. Remember that World Jewry had declared war on Germany in 1933 but were agitating for it even before Hitler came to power. The film then was intended to show the Rothschilds in a positive light and to gain sympathy for them, whilst subliminally sending out a message that to speak out against them was anti-Semitic.
I actually enjoyed watching the film as it was very well made for its time. There was the scene in the beginning where the Rothschilds hide their wealth from the tax collector (who turns out to be corrupt), the truth exposed when the father lectures his five sons on the power of money and their duty to Jews the world over and then the laughable bit, where during the Napoleonic wars, the Rothschilds alone keep the London Stock exchange going by buying up everything in site as the market collapses. This of course is the complete opposite of what Nathan Rothschild actually did.
At the end of the film, the Rothschilds are successful, shown to be the saviours of Europe, get the law changed so that Nathan may be made a Baron and finally accepted in the non-Jewish World as an equal. Quite sickening really, as there is no mention of the fortune they had made by financing the war that would have put them out of business had Wellington (their personal friend) been defeated at Waterloo – but still a film you must watch if you have any real interest in who rules the world. You can either watch or download the film here or go get it on youtube here.
So then, where are we now? Well the white world now, is where Germany was prior to 1933. Firmly under the control of the worlds Zionist Bankers who seek to destroy nation states in order to control them.
In 1933 Germany, with the rise of Hitler, the German people were reclaiming control of their country and financial systems and doing it rather successfully with National Socialist policies and so National Socialism and the home of it, Germany, had to be destroyed and punished by the Zionists and there in lies the problem we now face as Nationalists.
Our nation is a shambles, the Jews having brought us to the brink of bankruptcy with our young soldiers dying in illegal foreign wars demanded by the Jews who rule us as part of the Rothschild Empire.
Before I continue with the above theme, it is now time for us to go watch our second black and white movie. This time it is one that is often pointed at by Jews to show how anti-Semitc opposition to their plans to world domination is and to denigrate the words National Socialism – the only political philosophy that is able to halt and reverse the Zionist plans for the demise of the white race they hate.
The film is of course The Eternal Jew that was released in Germany in 1940 and even the Jews have had to admit that it has been one of the most successful “propaganda” films that reveals the truth about Zionism ever released.
So what did I make of it? Well first off, I recommend you download it here so you can watch it full screen. This version has an English voice over translation which should make it easier for you to watch. My version was subtitled but still very engrossing.
The first part about the Jews in Poland and the comparisons to rats in the beginning, I think was unnecessary but then again we are watching the film 72 years after it was made but this is why you simply must watch this film.
Because what you see happening in 1930’s Germany with the control over the economy of the Jewish Bankers, their pollution of German culture, film making, publishing, press, radio, education and politics is everything that is happening NOW in Our Country. Just think about the artistic abominations, the filth on the TV, the lionization of perverts and paedophiles that we True Brits are subjected to.
The final part of the film, which you should only watch if you have a strong stomach, is why National Socialists are opposed to the method in which both Jews and Moslems slaughter their animals for meat products and has nothing to do with them being Jews or Moslems – it is their sick religions that say this is the way animals must die. It is just plain cruel and barbaric.
If anyone who watches this film ever buys anything they even suspect of being killed in this way or buys food from their fast shite shops, then I say a pox on them and their first born.
Now I am sure that what I write next, is going to dismay some of you but it must be said.
The reasons that you see constant references to National Socialist policies being those of the “Nazis“, is to link those policies – which would destroy the Jewish fraudulent Banking system in an heart beat and take back into public ownership the assets the traitors infesting our governments have sold off to their Jewish controllers – to the greatest fraud the world as even seen. The Holohoax.
And why is the Holohoax so important to the Zionists? Well just go watch this video here. This former Jewish Minister explains it much better than I could and as a Jewess will be far more credible than I, when she says; “It’s a trick, we always use it“.
Now then, we know that National Socialism is the only cure for those destroying nations and the peace of the world but for it to become accepted we must stop concealing the truth for fear of upsetting the ignorant sheep people and tell the truth no matter what. The more people who say National Socialism is the only way forward, the sooner the truth will be out there.
Our enemies count on us denying that we are National Socialists for fear of being tarred as Nazi’s.
I say, let them call us what they will, you expect your enemies to slander you.
As Joseph Goebbels said just before the end in 1945. “There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph.”
Be proud to be a National Socialist – I am.
I caught a glimpse of a story on howstuffworks.com the other day entitled “The 10 Biggest Lies In History” and on the cover was none other than Adolf Hitler himself. Immediately I knew what I would find. So we get down to number 1 in the list of the 10 biggest lies in history and it is
To accomplish this, Adolf Hitler and his minister of propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, launched a massive campaign to convince the German people that the Jews were their enemies. Having taken over the press, they spread lies blaming Jews for all of Germany’s problems, including the loss of World War I. One outrageous lie dating back to the Middle Ages claimed that Jews engaged in the ritual killings of Christian children and used their blood in the unleavened bread eaten at Passover [source: Landau].
Using Jews as the scapegoat, Hitler and his cronies orchestrated what they called “the big lie.” This theory states that no matter how big the lie is (or more precisely, because it’s so big), people will believe it if you repeat it enough. Everyone tells small lies, Hitler reasoned, but few have the guts to tell colossal lies [source: Hoffer]. Because a big lie is so unlikely, people will come to accept it.
This theory helps us understand so many of the lies throughout history. Although we’ve barely scratched the surface of all those lies that deserve (dis)honorable mentions, you can satiate your historical curiosity by browsing the lists on the next page.”
I’m not sure whether to be glad when anti German writers bring up “the big lie” and attribute it to Hitler, or sad. On one hand it is so, so easy to debunk and show them for the fools they are. On the other hand it just perpetuates myths about Nazi Germany.
Well since this debunking doesn’t take much work, here is what Hitler was actually talking about regarding “the big lie”
“But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall [of Germany in WWI] precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the principle — which is quite true in itself — that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper stata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.
From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew “The Great Master of Lies.” Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.”
Now anyone with a room temperature IQ can clearly see that Hitler was accusing the jews of deceiving people by using “the big lie”. How ironic that these writers attribute this to Hitler when in reality it was Hitler showing this to the world. Reminds me of the old polish proverb “the jew cries out in pain as he strikes you”
But wait you may be saying, the article said Goebbels also helped spread “the big lie” Here is what Goebbels actually said on the subject
In a 1941 article titled “ Churchill’s Lie Factory,” he wrote:
“One should not as a rule reveal one’s secrets, since one does not know if and when one may need them again. The essential English leadership secret does not depend on particular intelligence. Rather, it depends on a remarkably stupid thick-headedness. The English follow the principle that when one lies, one should lie big, and stick to it. They keep up their lies, even at the risk of looking ridiculous.”
So again, as with 99.99% of everything else you read about Nazi Germany, this story at howstuffworks.com is a complete sham.
“I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator ; by defending myself against the Jews, I am fighting for the Lord….I would like to thank Providence and the Almighty for choosing me of all people”
By FRED BLAHUT
If the burning of the German Reichstag brought the National Socialists to power in 1933, were the Nazis responsible for the arson? If not, who was?
By 1933, Germany was ripe for another revolution. The Moscow-backed communist revolutions of 1919 had been put down at awful cost. And then the Allies imposed “reparations” that stripped the country of its ability to employ its workers and feed its people, including a British-engineered blockade that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Germans by starvation.
The worldwide depression of 1929 hit the country, still staggering under the yoke of the Treaty of Versailles, in the gut. Food was scarce. Jobs were disappearing. Those who had jobs earned money that was close to worthless.
It was clear that the centrist government of President Paul von Hindenburg and Chancellor Heinrich Bruning, under extreme pressure from both the left and the right, could not hold. Fearing civil war, Hindenburg dismissed Bruning and in January of 1933 appointed Adolf Hitler, leader of the National Socialists, as chancellor, even though Hitler had no absolute majority in the lower chamber of the German Parliament-the Reichstag.
And then, on the night of February 27, the Reichstag building burned.
It is important to note that, following the armistice of 1918, British Prime Minister lloyd George had promised the British voters “to squeeze the German lemon until the pips squeaked.” Germany had been stripped of its industry, its coal reserves in the Saar and the manufacturing capacities of Alsace-Lorraine.
The German Navy and merchant fleet had been seized; export barriers had been established for German products while free trade was imposed on imports produced by the Allies.
According to Leon Degrelle: “Germany was experiencing near-famine conditions. It was at this moment the Allies decided to confiscate a substantial part of what was left of Germany’s livestock.” (Hitler: Born at Versailles; Institute for Historical Review, 1987.)
Thomas Lamont, the American representative of the Allied powers “overseeing” Germany, was quoted: “The Germans were made to deliver cattle, horses, sheep, goats etc …. A strong protest came from Germany when dairy cows were taken to France and Belgium, thus depriving German children of milk.”
According to Degrelle, “The question was now: Who was going to break the chains?
“Germany looked for an avenger to smash the Treaty of Vengeance. The avenger could not belong to the conventional right and left wings of German politics or any other Establishment entities, whether financial, military or religious.”
In 1925, following the death of German President Friedrich Ebert, Hindenburg, a hero of World War I, was persuaded to run for president. He won easily. But, aging and ill, Hindenburg was not the national leader to bring Germany back from the abyss.
Prior to Hitler’s appointment, the Reichstag had been suspended several times with rule by presidential decree. Neither the left nor the right believed it was Hindenburg himself who was running the country, which staggered on ineffectually. By 1933, Hindenburg had become senile.
On this point, European newsman Alec de Montmorency tells a story that was making the rounds in the Paris clubs frequented by journalists. Hindenburg, the story goes, asked one of his close aides in early 1933: “Who is that young man with a mustache who keeps bringing me papers to sign?”
Immediately after Hitler’s appointment, the Reichstag was dissolved and new elections set for March 5. A violent election campaign ensued.
On February 24, the police raided Communist Party headquarters. It was announced that they had discovered plans for a new communist revolution. But they either didn’t discover what they said that they had, or the evidence, for unknown reasons, was suppressed, because such documentation was never made public.
Then came the Reichstag fire. Hitler immediately blamed the communists. Hindenburg proclaimed a state of emergency and issued decrees suspending freedom of speech and assembly. Thanks to the “Red scare,” the National Socialists and their allies, the German Nationalists, won a bare majority in the general election of March 5.
Shortly thereafter, first the Communist Party, and then all other parties except the National Socialist,were made illegal. The burning of the Reichstag was the spark that set the country ablaze. If, then, the fire was what catapulted Hitler to power, is it not reasonable to assume that the National Socialists had a hand in it? That was the consensus of propaganda in the United States, France and Great Britain.
The National Socialists blamed the communists, and tried to establish the guilt of Communist Party leaders in a trial at the High Court at Leipzig. They failed.
That led to the generally accepted theory that the National Socialists themselves torched the building. This version has been generally accepted. It appears in most textbooks and many reputable historians repeat it. According to A.J.P. Taylor in History Today, “I myself accepted it unquestioningly, without looking at the evidence.”
But someone did look at the evidence: A retired civil servant-and anti-Nazi named Fritz Tobias. He began his project, it is reported, with the idea of settling once and for all the fact that the Nazis had been responsible for the fire. But that’s not what he discovered. The results of his investigation were serialized in the German weekly Der Spiegel in 1950.
Here’s the story as detailed by Tobias.
At just about 9 pm on February 27, a theology student -later a lecturer at Bremen-named Hans Floter was on his way home after a day of research and study at the library. As he crossed the open space in front of the Reichstag, he heard the sound of breaking glass. He looked up and saw someone climbing into the building through a window on the first floor. The building was otherwise deserted except for a night watchman who apparently did not hear the breaking glass.
Floter ran to the comer and found a policeman. “Someone is breaking into the Reichstag,” he reported. The two men ran back to the building. Through the window they saw a shadowy, unidentifiable figure and something more ominous-flames. It was 9:03 pm. Floter, having done his duty, went home. He had not yet had supper and was hungry.
At this point, another passer-by joined the policeman, a young printer called Thaler, who was, incidentally, a Social Democrat, and definitely no supporter of the National Socialists. Thaler shouted: “Shoot, man, shoot.” The policeman fired his revolver into the building and the shadowy figure disappeared.
The policeman ran to the nearest police post and gave the alarm. The time recorded was 9:15 pm. Within minutes police backup arrived at the Reichstag, At 9:22, a police officer tried to enter the Debating Chamber. He was driven back by the flames. At 9:27, the police discovered and arrested a half-naked young man. He was a Dutchman named Marinus van der Lubbe.
Meanwhile, the fire brigade had also been alerted. The first report is recorded at 9:13. The first engine reached the Reichstag at 9:18. But the firemen had problems entering the building to fight the blaze. Only one side door was kept unlocked after 8 pm. The firemen, not knowing this, went to the wrong door.
Gaining entrance, the firemen fought the first fires they came to-small blazes in the corridors, it turns out, and not the main fire. Eventually, the full strength of the Berlin fire brigade was mobilized, a force of some 60 engines. The time was 9:42. But by then, the building was beyond help.
Seen as evidence of Nazi involvement in the blaze was the fact that across the street from the Reichstag building was the residence-sometimes called a palace-of its president. The National Socialists being in charge of the legislative body, the president of the Reichstag on February 27, 1933 was Nazi leader Hermann Goering. But Goering had not yet moved in.
The building was unoccupied except for an apartment on the top floor which Goering had lent to “Putzi” Hanftstaengl, Hitler’s foreign press chief. Hearing a commotion, Hanftstaengl looked out the window and saw the Reichstag burning. He knew that Hitler and Josef Goebbels were at a party nearby. He phoned Goebbels, who thought Hanftstaengel was playing some sort of practical joke and hung up. Hanftstaengel called back. Goebbels checked with the police and found the report was true.
Within a few minutes he, Hitler and a large group of National Socialists who had been at the party arrived at the Reichstag. An English journalist, Sefton Delmer, managed to join the crowd. Hitler, he reported, was very upset certainly not the demeanor of a man responsible for the action. “This is a communist plot, the signal for an uprising,” Delmer reported Hitler yelling to his supporters. “Every communist official must be shot. The communist members [of the Reichstag] must be hanged.”
Van der Lubbe, meanwhile, had been taken to the nearest police station. He was interrogated until 3 am of February 28. He was allowed to sleep for a few hours, awakened, given breakfast and, at 8 am, the questioning resumed. He gave clear, coherent answers. He described how he had entered the Reichstag and started a series of fires, even using some of his clothing to help the blazes get going.
The police, thoroughly and methodically, checked his story. They retraced his route through the Reichstag with a stopwatch and determined that the timing was correct for his entrance through a window to the time of his arrest. Van der Lubbe was clear about his motive. He had hoped that the entire German people would protest against the Nazi government. When this did not happen, he determined that he would protest individually.
Although the burning of the Reichstag was certainly a signal for revolt-he called it a “beacon” -he had given the signal alone, he insisted. He denied that he had any associates or fellow plotters. He said he knew no Nazis. He was not a member of the Communist Party. He was a socialist, more politically in tune with the left wing of the centrist government.
Van der Lubbe proved a willing witness against himself. He traced his movement for police during the weeks prior to the arson. He had drifted across Germany, apparently searching for anti-Nazi sentiment and finding nothing approaching the mass revolt he had hoped for. He even told police where he had purchased “fire-starter,” a petroleum-based liquid used, as its name implies, to start fires, and matches. The police checked his story. Everything he said proved to be correct.
The police officials conducting the investigation concluded that van der Lubbe was deranged-but above average in intelligence, with an exceptionally accurate sense of place and direction. He knew where he had been and what he had been doing and remembered even small details of his wanderings, purchases and arson.
His interrogators were experienced men, professionals with no political connections. They became convinced that he was telling the truth and that he had set the fire at the Reichstag all by himself, with no outside help or even encouragement. Firemen who had been at the scene agreed that the sequence of arson events detailed by van der Lubbe matched their investigation results.
That conclusion didn’t sit well with Hitler and the upper cadre of the National Socialists,locked in a bitter battle with the communists to gain control of the Reichstag. They had committed themselves to the proposition that the fire was a communist plot. Whether or not they believed this, it was the story that had to be sold to the German public if they were to defeat the communists at the polls.
Van der Lubbe and four others were tried for the arson; a man named Torgler, the leader of the communist bloc in the Reichstag, and three Bulgarian communists including Georgi Dimitrov.
Van der Lubbe’s guilt was beyond question. He had been found in the Reichstag and he admitted starting the fires. But that wasn’t what was worrying the Nazis. Everyone accepted van der Lubbe’s guilt. It was the communists the Nazis wanted convicted.
A number of “expert” witnesses were produced-with Nazi help-by the prosecution with the intention of proving that the fire could not have been started by one man. But van der Lubbe proved to be the best witness for the other defendants. Testifying for hours, he told the judges that it was he, and he alone, who was responsible. He was quoted: “I was there and they [the other four defendants] were not. 1know how it was done because 1did it.”
The High Court arrived at a complex verdict. First, van der Lubbe was found guilty. He was subsequently executed. (Arson was not a crime punishable by death. But Hitler managed to shove through a law to that effect and make its ramifications retroactive, a decision that would come back to haunt him.)
The other four defendants were found innocent. But, the court agreed with the Nazi-provided “expert” witnesses that the Dutchman could not have done it alone and that, therefore, the Reichstag had been torched by van der Lubbe and “persons unknown.”
The Nazis had been hoist by their own petard. If van der Lubbe had accomplices, and the accomplices were not communists, who were they? The implication was that the accomplices must have been National Socialists, a point made repeatedly in court by Dimitrov, and echoed by the Establishment media throughout the Western world.
(Dimitrov, incidentally, fled Germany following the trial to the USSR where he rose in the ranks of Soviet officialdom and later returned to Bulgaria to take over leadership of the communist government there.)
The propaganda possibilities of the High Court decision were not lost on the communists. Enter a man named Willi Munzenberg, a German expatriate communist popular with the media and the pro-communists in the West, particularly Great Britain. The communists published what was called the Brown Book about the fire, filled with alleged evidence of National Socialist complicity in the arson. That the communist evidence of Nazi involvement was no more convincing than the Nazis’ evidence of communist complicity was lost on the popular press.
Subsequently, the communists staged a counter-trial in London that, not unexpectedly, brought in a guilty verdict against the Nazis. Considered vital evidence in the counter-trial was the existence of a tunnel between Goering’s residence and the Reichstag which carried electric and telephone cables and pipes for central heating.
According to the communists, a group of Brown Shirts had used the tunnel to enter the Reichstag and soaked the curtains and woodwork with a flammable liquid which caught fire when ‘van der Lubbe struck the match or, alternately, they set the fire themselves. According to the latter version, when all was ready, van der Lubbe was pushed through the window into the Reichstag by an unnamed accomplice of the Brown Shirts, there to be found and arrested.
The Brown Book also alleged that, far from being an intelligent Socialist, Van der Lubbe was a degenerate half-wit and a homosexual prostitute, kept by Brown Shirt leader Ernst Roehm. This was the story accepted by the Western press in 1933 and, subsequently, historians. It became something “everyone knows,” without anyone actually examining the facts.
There were allegations that the fire brigades were deliberately delayed by the Nazis. But the record books of the aforementioned brigades disprove this. And, almost all history books say the records of van der Lubbe’s interrogation by the police had mysteriously disappeared. But again, that isn’t true. Tobias found them where they were supposed to be-in the office where they had always been-in eight copies.
Van der Lubbe, having been characterized by the Nazis as a communist dupe, was treated even more harshly by the communists. Included in the Brown Book is a statement by a Dutch friend of the arsonist. One sentence reads: “I often spent a night in the same bed with him.” This was used by the communists as proof of his homosexuality. But, according to Taylor, the sentence originally went on: ” … without observing any homosexual tendencies in him.”
Taylor goes on to point out that all the stories about van der Lubbe’s bad upbringing, about his disreputable family and his lack of friends “were in fact lies; communist forgeries.”
The most vital evidence produced by the communists was the tunnel and the allegation that it had been used by the Brown Shirts. This, the communists alleged, had been revealed by repentant Brown Shirts to communists in Paris. One alleged Brown Shirt appeared at the counter-trial with a muffler wrapped around his face to conceal his identity. It was a wise precaution, according to Taylor, because the witness “was, in fact, a well-known communist and unmistakably Jewish.”
Another confession supposedly came from one Karl Ernst, Brown Shirt leader in Berlin. Conveniently, the “confession” turned up after Ernst was dead, killed in the purge of June 30, 1934. Even more convenient, Ernst cleared up any items in the earlier communist versions of the arson where inaccuracies had been proven. But one point Ernst got wrong.
His post-mortem “confession” agreed with other “confessions” that the Brown Shirts entered the Reichstag at 8:49 pm. This had to be the time if they were to do their work before van der Lubbe was “pushed through the window” at 9:03. Unfortunately, Ernst (or the communist forgers) were unaware of one item in the Reichstag routine. At 8:45 pm, a postman came through the side door to collect the deputies’ mail.
On February 27, he entered as usual, walked through the deserted building and left at 8:55 pm. He found nothing out of the ordinary-no shadowy figures, no smell of flammable liquid. In fact, the postman disproves the “accomplices” theory, no matter who those accomplices were alleged to have been, because of the time sequences.
And then there is the small fact overlooked by historians-that when Goering arrived at the Reichstag at 9:35 pm, having been alerted by his friend, he immediately thought entrance might have been gained through the tunnel. He was quoted: “They [the arsonists] must have come through the tunnel.” He immediately went off with several policemen-not Nazis-to examine it. They found the doors at either end securely locked.
Would Goering have called for a search of the tunnel if he or his compatriots had been responsible for the fire? Hardly likely. He and the police might have caught the conspirators exiting on the Goering residence side.
In non-ideological retrospect, the same lack of evidence that exonerates the communists serves to also exonerate the National Socialists. If the Nazis had set fire to the Reichstag they would have manufactured evidence against the communists, just as the communists manufactured evidence against the Nazis in the Brown Book and the counter-trial.
The Brown Book was not intended to be closely examined. If it achieved its propaganda purpose-which it did, in the UK and the United States, at least- Munzenberg and his associates were satisfied.
Here is what can be determined from the facts that can be proved. No one came through the tunnel. There was no other way to enter the Reichstag, except past the night watchman or by breaking the window. Only van der Lubbe broke a window. Those who want to stick to the communist version, although they admit they can’t prove how the Nazis got into the Reichstag, point to the trial testimony that van der Lubbe had to have had help.
But this evidence is the most unreliable of all. The most emphatic “expert” was, according to Taylor, “a crank distrusted by his colleagues.” He claimed to be an authority on a strange “fluid” which, he said, was necessary for starting fires, He alleged that this “fluid” had a distinctive smell. But no policeman or fireman at the scene noticed any smell except smoke-no “fluid”; not even gasoline.
How could van der Lubbe have set the fire himself? These old, grandiose buildings were fires waiting to happen. There were heavy, dusty curtains everywhere; wooden paneling, high ceilings, drafts under the doors; everything capable of supporting a fire.
In 1834, the Houses of Parliament at Westminster in the UK were entirely destroyed by fire, Simply by a stove pipe becoming too hot. If this is too “historical” for today’s reader, in 1956, the Vienna Stock Exchange was gutted by fire as the result of one smoldering cigarette in a wastepaper basket. Van der Lubbe had over 20 minutes to start fires; more than enough time.
One point: the postman left the building at 8:55 pm. How did van der Lubbe know it was safe to break in? He couldn’t have; it was a lucky break, a coincidence. In any event, Hitler was well known for his penchant to improvise and it is obvious that is what he did while watching the Reichstag burn. Here was his chance to demonize the communists to his own advantage. He couldn’t have known the outcome of that decision.
That van der Lubbe was guilty is beyond question. There is more evidence to acquit both the communists and the National Socialists of complicity than evidence to convict either group. But Germany lost the war and the communists won; and the winners write the history books.
Davidson, Michael worth, MA, Editor. “Hitler Soars to Power.” When, Where, Why & How It Happened. Readers Digest Association limited, London, New York, Sydney, Cape Town, Montreal, 1995.
Degrelle, Gen. Leon. Hitler: Born at Versailles: lnstitute for Historical Review, Torrance, California, 1987.
Degrelle, Gen. Leon. Hitler: Democrat. Unpublished manuscript.
Montmorency, Alec de. Interview by the author, November, 1995.
Taylor, A.J.P. “Who Burned the Reichstag?” History Today, London, June, 1956.
Fred Blahut has been a writer and editor for more than 30 years and currently is managing editor of The SPOTLIGHT and assistant editor of TBR.
I don’t think any subject exists where more misinformation exists than that of Hitler and Nazi Germany. It is a topic where everyone has an opinion which they think is infallible. These are the people who regurgitate propaganda, have strong views on Hitler yet have never even read the first page of Mein Kampf.
For those of us who enjoy historical study and want to read accounts and speeches from that era straight from the source I don’t think you can do better than the following link. I plan on reposting stories and speeches here as time goes on in order to set the record straight and shine light on the Truth. Until then enjoy
The Mein Kampf Project